tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post1200187092431737839..comments2024-03-01T03:51:38.081-05:00Comments on Allergic to Bull: Did Roger Shuler Commit Unauthorized Practice of Law?A.W.http://www.blogger.com/profile/10876021589516844048noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-14248806885892810272013-11-06T04:05:41.594-05:002013-11-06T04:05:41.594-05:00And apparently Shuler is set to vouch for Roger S ...And apparently Shuler is set to vouch for Roger S not being himself , despite claims of his pals in the comment section at BU. I'm not a lawyer and does;t have much knowledge in <a href="http://www.gcylaw.com/real-estate-service" rel="nofollow"> Real Estate Law </a> Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01794084247883304487noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-24987813474699651412013-10-31T22:40:38.071-04:002013-10-31T22:40:38.071-04:00Oh I know.
And as far computer software is conce...Oh I know. <br /><br />And as far computer software is concerned...it's based on algorithms. Anyway, facial recognition has come a long way. And is pretty accessible on the open market. To say that there is any one program...there are hundreds. There is even freeware. <br /><br />But you can buy software from Best Buy, Amazon, CNet or any tech store. I would check it out first so you are clear about what you are purchasing. Because difference algorithms do different things.<br /><br />I would talk to Mr. Hoge if you are thinking about purchasing an algorithm. He would probably be able to help you find a product that is suitable for you. Lots of people have them now for a wide variety of applications. From security to graphic art.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-83204750324044251472013-10-31T20:58:04.083-04:002013-10-31T20:58:04.083-04:00i agree it isn't likely to be him. i was just ...i agree it isn't likely to be him. i was just playing devil's advocate. btw, what program would that be?A.W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10876021589516844048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-40447366327544798262013-10-31T20:50:47.220-04:002013-10-31T20:50:47.220-04:00Oh...Just so I'm not anonymous (8:02). I'm...Oh...Just so I'm not anonymous (8:02). I'm Black Betty. It's not an older picture of the judge. It's not the judge period. Look at the space between the lip line and the nose tip on both pictures. They don't match. The lips themselves don't match. The measurements between the facial features on the two images don't correlate. It isn't a matter of them looking like each other. It's a matter of them measuring like each other. <br /><br />That's just what I could I see visually. And I used to match faces in my old job. There is software that can make the calculations definitively and prove Shuler a liar. Shuler might find a similar photo, but he can't fool the math Gods. <br /><br />And they are vengeful. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-64362201730156292272013-10-31T18:52:29.577-04:002013-10-31T18:52:29.577-04:00anon at 8:02, maybe it was an even older pic. but...anon at 8:02, maybe it was an even older pic. but yes, i don't think he looks particularly much like him.<br /><br />I'll check the dates on the marriage, etc. that's an interesting angle.A.W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10876021589516844048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-38825804184747425022013-10-31T18:50:24.435-04:002013-10-31T18:50:24.435-04:00Anon at 2:57... well, you're right, it isn...Anon at 2:57... well, you're right, it isn't proof. But if i was the Alabama bar, i would be making inquiries, subpoenaing info from BU or just asking him in jail if he wrote that.<br /><br />But it is not proof. which is why i merely said it was evidence, and not proof.A.W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10876021589516844048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-78926251084304685052013-10-31T14:57:35.094-04:002013-10-31T14:57:35.094-04:00My only problem with so readily concluding Roger S...My only problem with so readily concluding Roger S. is Roger Schuler is that your proof relies heavily on "stuff Schmalfelt wrote." That and $5 will get you a frappucino.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-38661193692145896252013-10-31T08:02:47.041-04:002013-10-31T08:02:47.041-04:00That is not Judge Pryor.
Put aside the fact that...That is not Judge Pryor. <br /><br />Put aside the fact that Shuler did a BAD job finding a look-a-like when he trolled the gay porn sites. After all, he's not exactly Bill Schmalfeldt. When that nudie pick was posted to the porn site, Judge Pryor was serving as Alabama's Attorney General. And he was 35 years old. The young man in that picture is in his late teens to early twenties. Also, does anyone really believe that a sitting Attorney General "needed the cash"? Or that his devoutly Catholic WIFE took that picture and sent it to an obscure gay porn site as a gag? "Hey Honey, guess what I did while you were at work today?" And that Shuler, who has lost cases in Judge Pryor's court just happened to find that photo of him. <br /><br />Yeah. I don't think so. I think this is just another one of Crazy Shuler's delusional and defamatory creations. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com