tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post5223861566174893283..comments2024-03-01T03:51:38.081-05:00Comments on Allergic to Bull: Thuggery Fail! Brynaert Tries (Desperately) to Out MeA.W.http://www.blogger.com/profile/10876021589516844048noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-10893879550342924532011-12-14T06:37:01.575-05:002011-12-14T06:37:01.575-05:00I don't know what the injunction covers or doe...I don't know what the injunction covers or doesn't. I don't know anything about it. I have, however, seen injunctions that cover exactly that in cases like this.A.W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10876021589516844048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-6513704733467026822011-12-14T06:33:36.442-05:002011-12-14T06:33:36.442-05:00Then delete me completely, like I was never here. ...Then delete me completely, like I was never here. That's rubbish moderating. There's no injunction against me posting. I thought you were an attorney.Tokyo Shemphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01764134901412321022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-55701166811984760052011-12-14T06:30:09.327-05:002011-12-14T06:30:09.327-05:00Soc
I have removed your comment, because frankly ...Soc<br /><br />I have removed your comment, because frankly I know you presently have some kind of injunction related to all of this, and i want to avoid any violation of it. If you could do me a favor and forward a copy of the injunction, I will certainly let you post if it is in obedience to the injunction. i am sure that is annoying, but i have to protect myself from liability in that mess you are dealing with.A.W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10876021589516844048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-13436059431205553332011-12-14T04:41:05.436-05:002011-12-14T04:41:05.436-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Tokyo Shemphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01764134901412321022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-7681716941131761482011-12-14T00:39:23.767-05:002011-12-14T00:39:23.767-05:00"Anyway, all I know is that Ron admits he was..."Anyway, all I know is that Ron admits he was arrested for being drunk and yelling in a public place, and that Ron, a pathological liar, was actually rescuing someone at this time."<br /><br />Oops. There's a type. All I know is that Ron, a pathological liar, claims he was rescuing someone. Now, what would you expect Ron to do if faced with a record of being arrested? Personally, I would expect him to spin an emotional tale where everyone but Ron is evil, and Ron is the hero.<br /><br />Regardless, if you don't want to be called a criminal, Ron, you shouldn't commit crimes. Which you did (id).Dustinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15590811467601049788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-269025911278665322011-12-14T00:34:04.275-05:002011-12-14T00:34:04.275-05:00Also, if Ron is telling the truth that this record...Also, if Ron is telling the truth that this record was expunged, how did Alicia Pain know about it?<br /><br />If it so happens that this story lionizes Ron, why did Alicia Pain mention it?<br /><br />And why did Ron turn from friend to foe like flipping a light switch when I complained about Alicia posting Ron's criminal record?<br /><br />This is pretty weak, and circumstantial anyway, but I think Alicia knew about Ron's little adventure because Alicia was Ron's sock and this is some kind of show.<br /><br />Ron *is* a criminal. Ron claims he isn't a criminal if he isn't convicted, but this is not true. He's a criminal if he breaks the law. <br /><br />I think this: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/402/ronbrynaert2.jpg/ is criminal behavior.<br /><br />I think this: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/225/ronbrynaert3.jpg/ is both criminal behavior and Ron smearing Patterico with lies.<br /><br />Not that anyone is surprised to learn that Ron told lies about someone. That's something Ron does several times a day. For him to now scream and whine and cry and moan that he is upset about what someone said about him is very amusing.<br /><br />Anyway, all I know is that Ron admits he was arrested for being drunk and yelling in a public place, and that Ron, a pathological liar, was actually rescuing someone at this time. Ron then demands I accept his word, even though Ron knows he has absolutely the worst credibility imaginable.Dustinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15590811467601049788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-34605911568578837152011-12-14T00:13:06.032-05:002011-12-14T00:13:06.032-05:00Aaron, that is an incredible story. I mean that l...Aaron, that is an incredible story. I mean that literally. Knowing, as I do, that Ron lies like you or I breath, and that he has a story where he explains an arrest with a tale about how he is the oppressed hero, I flatly do not believe a word of it.<br /><br />All I know is that apparently Ron claimed he was arrested, and then he bashes someone else for being arrested. He claims he wasn't convicted, and yet he's bashing someone who also hasn't been convicted. He claims he was frustrated by slow justice, yet he's bashing someone who was being screwed by a con artist and violent felon (whom Ron loves to defend).<br /><br />In short, Ron is at best a total hypocrite.<br /><br />But I agree, if Ron is telling the truth (for once) it does not harm his reputation for this to be mentioned. But to be blunt, it wouldn't harm his reputation if he were caught doing something awful, as that is the reputation Ron rightly has.<br /><br />And the bottom line for me is that I will mention Ron's criminal record if I feel like it, and I personally vouch that Ron is a criminal for, at minimum: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/204/ronbrynaert.jpg/ where he threatened a man and his family.<br /><br />And while I cannot vouch for worse, I believe Ron has done worse.Dustinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15590811467601049788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-8477221510647715162011-12-13T23:34:33.491-05:002011-12-13T23:34:33.491-05:00"How calm would you be if a family member is ..."How calm would you be if a family member is missing? How patient would you be?"<br /><br />I believe that there is an entire couple a threads at Patrick's blog where I explain exactly how I would act in such a case.<br /><br />While "calm" might possibly be an accurate description, one certainly would never call it "nice".Scott Jacobshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01535287167298591797noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-1445406598049392792011-12-13T21:32:55.231-05:002011-12-13T21:32:55.231-05:00I have been exchanging emails with Ron and I will ...I have been exchanging emails with Ron and I will share to a degree some additional context. He states that his "record" consisted of being arrested once. He was not convicted and to hear it told, it was kind of a bullsh-t situation. Basically as he tells it, a member of his family had been abducted at a club, and he attempted to get management to help him locate this family member. They refused and he called the police and while the police was dragging their heels, he yelled at them and was arrested for that. If you credit his account, even if he was a little in the wrong (a big if), I don't think it does any discredit to his character. How calm would you be if a family member is missing? How patient would you be?<br /><br />And i say that bluntly leaving out a lot of details out of respect for the primary victim of this crime. From his account it fairly sounds like a nightmare.<br /><br />He further asserts later that the judge agreed to expunge his arrest from his record. So as far as the law is concerned, it didn't actually happen.<br /><br />I will say that he has submitted to me no objective evidence to support this story, so we only have his veracity to go on. For what it is worth, for all the bad feelings I have had with him, and the deliberate deception I have accused him of, I actually believe him on this one. You can take that for what its worth.A.W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/10876021589516844048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-58097841558293781812011-12-13T20:46:42.047-05:002011-12-13T20:46:42.047-05:00I think it's libel in both those cases.
I kno...I think it's libel in both those cases.<br /><br />I know you were just kidding, though.<br /><br />Here's an interesting civ pro question: if some state judge in New York ordered that some aspect of Ron's record be deleted, does that judge have any jurisdiction over me in any way (I'm not in New York)?<br /><br />OK... that's actually not very interesting. And to be honest, I doubt his order would have any impact on me unless I were actually in his courtroom and openly contemptuous, or if I were processing records for New York. But I don't know, or care, as I am not under their jurisdiction. Oh, and I have a fundamental, constitutional right to criticize Ron and his political thuggery, as well as the thuggery of 'Alicia Pain,' whether these are the same people in some bizarre ruse, or separate thugs.Dustinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15590811467601049788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-71774173026549800552011-12-13T20:33:30.229-05:002011-12-13T20:33:30.229-05:00If someone slanders someone using voice-to-text so...If someone slanders someone using voice-to-text software, does constitute libel? Or would the use of text-to-speech software convert libel to slander? Ah, what a wondrous world with computers in it!htomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10079911355302503367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-62578308213558389352011-12-13T16:35:22.998-05:002011-12-13T16:35:22.998-05:00Ron, the "journalist", is still hanging ...Ron, the "journalist", is still hanging onto Weinergate for dear life, and even calls the entity known as "Dan Wolfe" his source.<br />Yet, when he doesn't get the info he wants, he immediately accuses one of being a thug, a goon, stalker, or brings up my past by posting it everywhere. <br />But this isn't the first time he has emailed or tweeted someone's boss or colleague or friends. He seems to be proud of being a troublemaker.<br />Look at his timeline. He finds a victim and tweets like mad for a few days, tires of that person, and goes onto a new target.<br />And, I'm sure he and his thug buddies will have a field day with me today and tonite as they all commiserate together. I look forward to it now. <br />Bravo, Ron, for wasting so many people's time.<br />Funny that even Raw Story wont even take your calls.<br />Wait, Dan Wolfe just called. He said that there is going to be a scandal with the downed drone in Iran. Get hopping buddygoatsredhttp://cryingwolfe.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-14281288542850787772011-12-13T16:31:13.895-05:002011-12-13T16:31:13.895-05:00Apparently Ron is complaining that I am 'libel...Apparently Ron is complaining that I am 'libeling' him for noting he has some kind of criminal record he claims was expunged.<br /><br />As I said above, I have no idea if there even is a Ron Brynaert, or which version of his claims about his criminal record are accurate.<br /><br />Alicia Pain (whom I think IS Ron) left comments discussing Ron's criminal record in one of Patterico's monster threads. I actually complained about these comments to the mods, and they were quickly deleted. I then complained about the use of thug tactics against Ron, and Ron started acting insane towards me. He claims there was some kind of criminal record and that his crimes were expunged, and frankly, I have no idea if that's true. He also claims that because the court expunged his record, it's some kind of crime if I mention this event in any way. That is obviously absurd.<br /><br />Ron, what crimes were you arrested for? Were you convicted? Can you prove that you are actually named Ron Brynaert? Why are bashing people for being arrested if you yourself were arrested?<br /><br />Regardless, I have no idea what the truth is about this character. I do know that whoever is commenting as Ron is in fact a criminal because I've seen this person threaten people with violence and threaten their families with violence. Personally, I have a hard time believing anyone would do that by their true name, but maybe this guy is that crazy.<br /><br />Anyway, Ron promised to sue me quite a while ago, and apparently he's mad again, which is great... my angering a violent, racist slimeball like Ron gives me a warm feeling inside. I wanted to share my basis for my comments, which are Ron's own claims that he has an expunged criminal record. If this is not true, then Ron shouldn't have claimed it was.Dustinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15590811467601049788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-44258164769195311902011-12-13T02:39:06.118-05:002011-12-13T02:39:06.118-05:00Yes, I will confirm, I reported it to authorities....Yes, I will confirm, I reported it to authorities. But I will also add that I did not know the person at the time and was unsure how to interpret that email or what his situation truly was. Months later, having since gotten to know this person, and having had the opportunity to investigate thoroughly, I've come to learn that he is not a bad person at all. In fact, it's disturbing to see how some people have grossly manipulated the incident. Let's just say that there are some very talented and diabolical trolls out there who've learned how to make their victims look like the guilty ones. Imagine years of enduring the shenanigans Aaron is exposing above. The online world sometimes makes it difficult to get to the true story without stepping into the real world for facts - perhaps something Ron should try. He seems to coddle together his version of reality by cherry picking tweets and blog comments and crafting them into the narrative that suits his needs. Or more importantly, the needs of others.Liberty Chickhttp://libertychick.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8044318176622758692.post-29968994284959655942011-12-13T02:07:53.731-05:002011-12-13T02:07:53.731-05:00I can't wait for the full story.
Particularly...I can't wait for the full story.<br /><br />Particularly on Ron and pal's continued slander of Socrates and their continued fawning over Brett.<br /><br />Ron's derangement at those who criticize him is a trend for this circle of people, and sadly it probably extends beyond the strange behavior we see here.<br /><br />I also just want to note that these folks are truly great at trolling. It's not just attention they want. They want to infuriate their targets (those who tell the truth about Brett seems to be the most common trait) into making mistakes.<br /><br />Of course, Ron has smeared just about everyone he's come into contact with... even friends, which I guess is some kind of game theory in play. So have most of his buds. They smear at will, and yet if they also are quick to threaten to sue if 'defamed' with something accurate, such as Ron's criminal record (at least Ron claims he has one... for all I know that was BS too).<br /><br />There's no point applying the notion of fairness to these people. They are just playing a game. Get a reaction, hopefully a horrible reaction, and then they use that to drum up division and fear and anger, even when what prompted the anger was far worse.<br /><br />Ron knows he's just a disposable tool of provocation. I have no idea if there even is a person out there really named Ron Brynaert. There was no Larissa Alexandrova, after all.<br /><br />I get the impression several of the players here are the same person, and some of the bickering between them is a show. I'd really love to know what the freaking punchline is at this point. It's been going on for quite a long time.Dustinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15590811467601049788noreply@blogger.com