Bill Clinton has attacked Mitt Romney—and by extension
defended Barack Obama—by saying... no, I
won’t just characterize it because you won’t believe me if I do. Let me quote it, but stand back lest you are
sucked in: “Who wants a president who will knowingly, repeatedly tell you something
he knows is not true?”
I know what you are thinking. No,
come on, Bill Clinton can’t be that
unaware. He can’t have really said that,
could he?
Well, here is the video:
The quote comes at about the forty five second march and
is tearing apart the fabric of reality itself.
And all of this to defend Obama, implying that he is
truthful. You know, the guy who attacked
freedom of speech in order to cover for his failures in Benghazi.
Seriously, if there was any doubt before, this removes
it. Bill
Clinton is a sociopath.
---------------------------------------
My wife and I have lost our jobs
due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an
attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up
to ten years. I know that claim sounds
fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these
claims using documentary and video evidence.
If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin
accountable, please hit the Blogger’s Defense Team button on the right. And thank you.
Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing,
mostly for snark and site updates. And
you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent
History here.
And you can read a little more about my novel, here.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused some people,
particularly Brett Kimberlin, of
reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even
criminal. In all cases, the only justice I want is through the
appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system. I do not want to see vigilante violence
against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the particular case of Brett
Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part
because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want
that to happen to him.
And for that matter, don’t go on
his property. Don’t sneak around and try
to photograph him. Frankly try not to
even be within his field of vision. Your
behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to
mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not contact his
organizations, either. And most of all, leave his family alone.
The only exception to all that is
that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with
contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might
report. And even then if he tells you to
stop contacting him, obey that request. That
this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that
a person asks you to stop and you refuse.
And let me say something
else. In my heart of hearts, I don’t
believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
Sorry, doesn't register. My irony meter broke a while back when Obama said we need sacrifice neither science nor ethics in a speach where he was doing both.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, Bill Clinton is a pathological liar in that he believes what ever he says at the moment he says it. In that case, Clinton never told a lie, because he believed what he said.
ReplyDeleteConversely, if Bill does not believe what another says, or even if he doesn't want to believe what someone else says, then in Bill's mind, that other person is a liar, and it doesn't matter what the actual, objective facts are.
For this incident to be a case of chutzpay, Bill would have to know and acknowledge that he is a serial liar, and that just won't happen.
There's no reason to assume he is unaware. He knows better than any that no one "wants a president who will knowingly, repeatedly tell you something he knows is not true?"
ReplyDeleteThe only lack of awareness here is that I don't believe there has ever been a presidential candidate in my life time who hasn't done exactly that. If you'd commented on that instead of warping it into partisan angst, you'd have something worth reading.