Well, yes he does. And I have long said that one of the fun
things about twitter is it gives you the chance to talk back to famous people
so... let the fun begin!
So @thereval you feel cops are often racist and break the law... and we should rely on them exclusively for protection? allergic2bull.blogspot.com/2013/01/we-nee…
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) January 10, 2013
.@thereval you say that Brawley might've been telling the truth. Should she rely solely on the police for protection? allergic2bull.blogspot.com/2013/01/we-nee…
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) January 10, 2013
Heck if you don’t believe Ms.
Brawley, it might make sense to be armed.
Most police are good professional people who don’t care who they are
protecting. But she would have cause for
rational concern that the police might be less inclined to protect her given her
conduct in the past. She might worry
that if she was in danger she would have no one she could rely on but herself.
.@thereval you have spent your whole career attacking the police. And now you want to tell us to rely on them? allergic2bull.blogspot.com/2013/01/we-nee…
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) January 10, 2013
btw @thereval in the South after the Civil War, the Democrats disarmed black people.This was done for their benefit, right? #guncontrol
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) January 10, 2013
Shorter @thereval: cops are racist and corrupt, and we should disarm and trust our lives solely to their protection. allergic2bull.blogspot.com/2013/01/we-nee…
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) January 10, 2013
Btw, @thereval Martin Luther King Jr. believed in and practiced the right to bear arms. huffingtonpost.com/adam-winkler/m… #guncontrol #nowaynra
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) January 10, 2013
Indeed, @thereval, MLK applied for & was rejected for a concealed carry permit. This was for his own benefit, right? huffingtonpost.com/adam-winkler/m…
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) January 10, 2013
I bet @thereval you wish you had told MLK "clearly, you do not need a gun. You should trust the police to protect you!" huffingtonpost.com/adam-winkler/m…
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) January 10, 2013
After all, @thereval, if Martin Luther King Jr. couldn't trust the Bull Connors of the world to protect his life, who can we trust?
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) January 10, 2013
No, he hasn’t responded, and
indeed he might not even personally use this account. But it is fun to point out some of the
contradictions in his position.
---------------------------------------
My wife and I have lost our jobs
due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an
attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up
to ten years. I know that claim sounds
fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these
claims using documentary and video evidence.
If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin
accountable, please hit the Blogger’s Defense Team button on the right. And thank you.
Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing,
mostly for snark and site updates. And
you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent
History here.
And you can read a little more about my novel, here.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused some people, particularly
Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible
conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even criminal. In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such
as the criminal justice system. I do not
want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such
violence. This kind of conduct is
not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the particular case of Brett
Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part
because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want
that to happen to him.
And for that matter, don’t go on
his property. Don’t sneak around and try
to photograph him. Frankly try not to
even be within his field of vision. Your
behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to
mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not contact his
organizations, either. And most of all, leave his family alone.
The only exception to all that is
that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with
contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might
report. And even then if he tells you to
stop contacting him, obey that request. That
this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that
a person asks you to stop and you refuse.
And let me say something
else. In my heart of hearts, I don’t
believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
No comments:
Post a Comment