What I am talking about is
politicians who are arguing in support of gay marriage. For instance, we have Barack Obama’s official
twitter account tweeting out the following:
RT if you stand with the millions of Americans fighting for #MarriageEquality. twitter.com/BarackObama/st…
— Barack Obama (@BarackObama) March 26, 2013
And we get an amicus brief filed
by “172
Members of the House of Representatives and 40 U.S. Senators” in the
Defense of Marriage case. An amicus
brief literally means a “friend of the court brief.” These are briefs filed by persons who are not
parties and are not necessarily aligned with either side, but might shed some
light on things, and so the court allows them to file such a brief. For instance, if there is a great Freedom of
Expression case before the Supreme Court there is a good chance the ACLU will
file a brief giving their position on the subject.
And in the case of the 212
members of congress brief mentioned above, the message is pretty much summed up
in the conclusion:
DOMA imposes a
sweeping and unjustifiable federal disability on married same-sex couples. It
is “class legislation” that lacks any rational connection to legitimate federal
interests, thus violating the Fifth Amendment’s equal-protection guarantee.
The judgment of the
court of appeals accordingly should be affirmed.
So they want at least the Federal
Government to recognize the gay marriages performed in the states that
recognize them.
And when it is just a bunch of
law professors doing so, it is harmless enough.
I have no doubt that Justices Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas are used to not
caring what a bunch of liberal law professors think when appropriate, and I am
sure Roberts and Alito are becoming well practiced in that art. But in the case of these 212 members of
Congress, or Barack Obama, the message is a bit different. The vast majority of these politicians are
people who have done almost nothing in practical terms to support gay
marriage. So what they are really saying
to the court is this:
We lack the courage
of our convictions. We want to say we
support gay marriage, but we are afraid of actually doing anything to advance
gay marriage because of the politics involved.
So please let us off the hook by saying that the Constitution demands
the outcome we don’t have the courage to work for.
Of course the accusation of
cowardice is not going to be true in every case, but what has Barack Obama
actually done for gay marriage besides declare once he was for it, then against
it, then for it again? And here is the
complete list of Congresscritters who signed on to this amicus:
United States Senators
Tammy Baldwin, Michael F. Bennet,
Richard Blumenthal, Barbara Boxer, Sherrod Brown, Maria Cantwell, Benjamin
Cardin, Thomas R. Carper, Christopher Coons, William “Mo” Cowan, Richard J.
Durbin, Dianne Feinstein, Al Franken, Kirsten Gillibrand, Tom Harkin, Martin
Heinrich, Mazie K. Hirono, Tim Kaine, Angus S. King, Jr., Amy Klobuchar, Frank
R. Lautenberg, Patrick J. Leahy, Claire McCaskill, Robert Menendez, Jeff
Merkley, Barbara A. Mikulski, Christopher S. Murphy, Patty Murray, Harry Reid, Bernie
Sanders, Brian Schatz, Charles E. Schumer, Jeanne Shaheen, Debbie Stabenow, Jon
Tester, Mark Udall, Mark R. Warner, Elizabeth Warren, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Ron
Wyden
Members of the U.S. House of
Representatives
Robert E. Andrews, Ron Barber, Karen
Bass, Joyce Beatty, Xavier Becerra, Ami Bera, Timothy H. Bishop, Earl
Blumenauer, Suzanne Bonamici, Robert A. Brady, Bruce L. Braley, Corinne Brown, Julia
Brownley, Cheri Bustos, Lois Capps, Michael E. Capuano, Tony Cárdenas, John C.
Carney, Jr., André Carson, Matthew A. Cartwright, Kathy Castor, Joaquin Castro,
Judy Chu, David N. Cicilline, Yvette D. Clarke, Wm. Lacy Clay, Emanuel Cleaver,
James E. Clyburn, Steve Cohen, Gerald E. Connolly, John Conyers, Jr., Joe
Courtney, Joseph Crowley, Elijah E. Cummings, Danny K. Davis, Susan A. Davis, Diana
DeGette, John K. Delaney, Rosa L. DeLauro, Suzan K. DelBene, Theodore E. Deutch,
John D. Dingell, Lloyd Doggett, Michael F. Doyle, Tammy Duckworth, Donna F.
Edwards, Keith Ellison, Eliot L. Engel, Anna G. Eshoo, Elizabeth H. Esty, Sam
Farr, Chaka Fattah, Bill Foster, Lois Frankel, Marcia L. Fudge, Tulsi Gabbard, John
Garamendi, Joe Garcia, Alan Grayson, Al Green, Raúl M. Grijalva, Luis V.
Gutierrez, Janice Hahn, Colleen W. Hanabusa, Alcee L. Hastings, Denny Heck, Brian
Higgins, James A. Himes, Rush Holt, Michael M. Honda, Steven A. Horsford, Steny
H. Hoyer, Jared Huffman, Steve Israel, Sheila Jackson Lee, Hakeem S. Jeffries, Eddie
Bernice Johnson, Henry C. “Hank” Johnson, Jr., Marcy Kaptur, William R. Keating,
Joseph P. Kennedy III, Daniel T. Kildee, Derek Kilmer, Ann Kirkpatrick, Ann M.
Kuster, James R. Langevin, John B. Larson, Barbara Lee, Sander M. Levin, John
Lewis, David Loebsack, Zoe Lofgren, Alan S. Lowenthal, Nita M. Lowey, Michelle
Lujan Grisham, Daniel B. Maffei, Carolyn B. Maloney, Sean Patrick Maloney, Edward
J. Markey, Doris O. Matsui, Carolyn McCarthy, Betty McCollum, Jim McDermott, James
P. McGovern, Jerry McNerney, Gregory W. Meeks, Grace Meng, Michael H. Michaud, George
Miller, Gwen Moore, James P. Moran, Patrick Murphy, Jerrold Nadler, Grace F.
Napolitano, Richard E. Neal, Gloria Negrete McLeod, Richard M. Nolan, Eleanor
Holmes Norton, Beto O’Rourke, William L. Owens, Frank Pallone, Jr., Bill
Pascrell, Jr., Ed Pastor, Donald M. Payne, Jr., Nancy Pelosi, Ed Perlmutter, Gary
C. Peters, Scott H. Peters, Chellie Pingree, Mark Pocan, Jared Polis, David E.
Price, Mike Quigley, Charles B. Rangel, Lucille Roybal-Allard, Raul Ruiz, C.A.
Dutch Ruppersberger, Bobby L. Rush, Tim Ryan, Linda T. Sánchez, Loretta Sanchez,
John P. Sarbanes, Janice D. Schakowsky, Adam B. Schiff, Bradley S. Schneider, Allyson
Y. Schwartz, Robert C. “Bobby” Scott, José E. Serrano, Carol Shea-Porter, Brad
Sherman, Kyrsten Sinema, Albio Sires, Louise McIntosh Slaughter, Adam Smith, Jackie
Speier, Eric Swalwell, Mark Takano, Mike Thompson, John F. Tierney, Dina Titus,
Paul Tonko, Niki Tsongas, Chris Van Hollen, Juan Vargas, Marc A. Veasey, Nydia
M. Velázquez, Timothy J. Walz, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Maxine Waters, Henry
A. Waxman, Peter Welch, and John A. Yarmuth
What have any of them done for
gay marriage? Indeed as a few people
have points out, for a few years Obama had a Democratic House and a Democratic
Senate and still they made no attempt to repeal DOMA, let alone any effort to
create a constitutional amendment promoting gay marriage. So they want the Supreme Court to do for them
what they didn’t have the courage to do themselves.
And it is even worse than
that. Depending on how far the Supreme
Court goes, it could lock in the answer for all time (or at least until the Supreme
Court overturns itself or is overturned by an amendment). So if the Supreme Court decides that gay
marriage is guaranteed by the Constitution, that the end of the debate for the
forseeable future: good, bad or indifferent, we will be stuck with that outcome
for decades. By comparison, if Congress
repealed DOMA or California got rid of Proposition 8, and it turned out to be a
bad idea, it would only take a majority to change their minds.
This is not unheard of. For instance, as Attorney General of
Minnesota, Walter Mondale organized an amicus brief in the case of Gideon v. Wainwright. That was the case where the Supreme Court decided
that criminal defendants had a right to a free lawyer. If you look very close at the Constitution,
the right to a free attorney is never mentioned. Your right to an attorney is mentioned, but
that only meant that if you could hire one, or otherwise obtain one, you had a
right to one. The right to a free attorney—that is, a publicly
subsidized one—was never guaranteed. But
the Supreme Court made up such a right out of thin air in Gideon.
And consider what a huge and
frightening step this was. Of course,
states are left to figure out how to get that free lawyer for that person. In most states they have a public defenders’
office and pay those people very little and thus create an ongoing concern that
the counsel provided is not sufficiently effective, creating additional grounds
for appeal. And a few states instead opt
to allow judges conscript lawyers into the
service of these criminals. That is,
a judge literally orders an attorney who happens to be around to represent
someone they didn’t wish to represent.
So apparently the Thirteenth Amendment has an exception for
lawyers. And all of this was done without
the consent of the people.
And the worst thing was Mondale’s
amicus in support of this approach. He
was himself a politician. If he and his
fellow attorneys general felt this was so important, they could take the issue
to the people. Instead again he asked
the Supreme Court to do the work for him that he wouldn’t or couldn’t
accomplish through democratic means.
With both the politicians arguing
that DOMA should be declared unconstitutional and the politicians asking the Supreme
Court to shackle their states with a requirement of free counsel, it is an abdication
of their democratic roles. They are
asking the Supreme Court to take decisions away from them and the people, because they cannot get the democratic process to
come out the way they want, or more darkly because they lack the courage to
fight for their actual positions in the democratic process. Whatever one feels about the issue of gay marriage
or the right to a free lawyer, their act of asking the Supreme Court to take
the decision away from us is nothing less than shameful.
---------------------------------------
My wife and I have lost our jobs
due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an
attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up
to ten years. I know that claim sounds
fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these
claims using documentary and video evidence.
If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin
accountable, please hit the Blogger’s Defense Team button on the right. And thank you.
Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing,
mostly for snark and site updates. And
you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent
History here.
And you can read a little more about my novel, here.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused some people,
particularly Brett Kimberlin, of
reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even criminal. In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such
as the criminal justice system. I do not
want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such
violence. This kind of conduct is
not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the particular case of Brett
Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part
because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want
that to happen to him.
And for that matter, don’t go on
his property. Don’t sneak around and try
to photograph him. Frankly try not to
even be within his field of vision. Your
behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to
mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not contact his
organizations, either. And most of all, leave his family alone.
The only exception to all that is
that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with
contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might
report. And even then if he tells you to
stop contacting him, obey that request.
That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under
Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.
And let me say something
else. In my heart of hearts, I don’t
believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
To be fair, at least some of the Congressvarmints who signed on to that amicus were elected in 2010 or 2012, and thus were not around when Obama had majorities in both the House and Senate. I might give more weight to a brief signed by just those members, though, and not someone like Harry Reid or Nancy Pelosi, who were probably around when DOMA was originally passed.
ReplyDeleteI'm going to disagree with you on a couple of things here ...
ReplyDeleteIn the case of the members of Congress brief, the number of representatives and senators signing on is key. If there were 218 representatives and 51 senators signing, then the Supreme Court could say, "Why are you bothering to oppose DOMA in court? Just repeal it." But 172 representatives and 40 senators are not enough to pass a bill. On the other hand, they do represent a significant difference from the 67 representatives and 14 senators who opposed DOMA when it passed back in 1996.
Also, in the Gideon v. Wainwright case, Minnesota and many other states already provided free counsel to criminal defendants. Mondale wasn't asking the Supreme Court to bypass the political process in his own state.
It may have been a side point, but I hope you can address it at some point: I'm having an impossible time understanding the 14th amendment's connection to Gideon v. Wainright, Powell v. Alabama, and the 6th amendment, aside from its mention of due process in the first section. Taking all 4 elements into consideration is like looking at a ball of Christmas lights.
ReplyDelete