Now first, dear reader, we are about to talk about what is going on in Anthony Weiner’s head. This is going to involve some frank discussion about his sex life so... be warned. But I think I am going to get at a good point, here.
So yesterday we learned that
Anthony Weiner has created a new twitter account. Indeed we even had a Twitchy Weiner Twitchy
post on Weiner’s new account. And this
prompted more than a few jokes by myself and others. Okay, a
lot of jokes. But I find sometimes
when you are riffing off something, you occasionally stumble on a deeper point.
One important piece in the second
coming of Weiner, is his “Keys to the City” document. You can read it all here,
and it is mainly the usual liberal claptrap, but it’s designed to convince New
Yorkers that Weiner is an “idea man.” And
I had some pointed commentary aimed at his proposal to make smokers pay for
city health insurance. You see, he is
proposing that the city offer a “single payer” health insurance, and then to
make smokers pay more for said insurance.
Of course that is done ordinarily
by private insurance, but it becomes
more sinister when it’s the government doing it, because it means that the
government would collect all kinds of private data about you (which should
raise privacy concerns), evaluate how your live your life and then change how
much you pay for insurance based on those choices (which should raise a
different kind of privacy concern). And there
are a lot of choices that might affect the cost of health care...
.@anthonyweiner says ppl who smoke should pay more for health care. How about men who cheat on their wives? After all, they get more STDs.
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) April 23, 2013
Although to be fair, @anthonyweiner, if the man only "cybercheats" on his wife he is not going to get anything worse than tennnis elbow.
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) April 23, 2013
Like I said, I had a lot of fun with Weiner. And a few typos. Oh well.
Btw should people in porn pay higher premiums, @anthonyweiner? That's something you should treat very Ginger Lee. (say it out loud, folks)
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) April 23, 2013
If you don’t get the Ginger Lee
reference, you might
look up this old post at Patterico’s.
And underneath the humor, you can see there is a serious point. Why is it that when it comes to privacy, it
begins and ends with sex for liberals?
Privacy is supposed to be about allowing you to live your own life as
long as you don’t hurt others, but to hear the left speak and more importantly to look at their policies, privacy only
applies to sexual matters. If there is a
constitutional right to gay sex, there is a constitutional right to a large
soda and a constitutional right to smoke.
I am sure gay liberals would never tolerate being charged more for government
insurance for being gay, so why should people be charged more for being smokers?
So I dared to click a Weiner link
and made a bunch of jokes with a substantive core against him. And a bunch of jokes on his last name and his
famous scandal, because let’s face it, the jokes are still funny. But something
leapt out at me when looking at his “Keys to the City” document:
Btw does anyone notice anything *unusual* about @anthonyweiner's new logo? cc @beccajlower @twitchymedia @twitchyteam twitter.com/AaronWorthing/…
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) April 23, 2013
Let me highlight what is wrong with @anthonyweiner's new logo in green. cc @beccajlower @twitchymedia @twitchyteam twitter.com/AaronWorthing/…
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) April 23, 2013
That’s right, folks. God help us, it’s a phallic tower in the
middle of his logo. And after several
tweets mocking that, I noticed that
is not the only phallic issue involved in that logo:
And the term is Keys to the City, @anthonyweiner... Are you saying you are the key master? @beccajlower @twitchyteam twitter.com/AaronWorthing/…
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) April 23, 2013
"keymaster"... Where have I heard that term b4? @anthonyweiner youtube.com/watch?v=YnJvsB… cc @beccajlower @twitchyteam twitter.com/AaronWorthing/…
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) April 23, 2013
(“b4” = “before”) And I don’t think you will see it very well,
but that contains a link to this video:
Yes, “key” can have a phallic
meaning as well.
And there is a deeper meaning to
these jokes, as hinted at more directly at by this joke:
Are you feeling a little inadequate these days, @anthonyweiner? Is that what this logo is? @beccajlower @twitchyteam twitter.com/AaronWorthing/…
— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) April 23, 2013
You see, Patterico, Lee Stranahan
and I covered the Weinergate scandal pretty extensively a few years back. So I read a great deal, including God help
me, his cybersexing conversations with various women and a lot of commentary on
it.
What was overwhelmingly obvious
about the situation was that a lot of what drove Weiner’s behavior was a sense
of inadequacy. For instance, to this day
this profile pic is on his old @repweiner twitter account:
He feels like a nerdy, ‘fro’ed
kid in high school inside. That is why
he constantly sought the affirmation of women besides his wife. I mean let’s remember something: he didn’t
actually have sex with other women (as far as we know). As Bill Maher pointed out in this very funny
clip, mechanically speaking, it was masturbation
not sex:
In other words, this was not women
providing pleasure to him by their bodies.
Their bodies were often thousands of miles away. This was their words providing him some kind of sexual gratification. Alec Baldwin, in a rather pathetic defense of
Weiner, managed to put his finger on it in the midst of it all:
For high functioning
men like Weiner and other officials who have lived through such scandals, who
are constantly on the go, that leaves one tried and true source of a reliable
high. The affirmation that comes when someone lets you know they want to sleep
with you. Or even cyber-sleep with you.
And if you force yourself to read
some of those cybersex conversations, you will see they are filled with that
need for affirmation, to be told by a woman that he is a stud, well-endowed,
etc. It gets gnarlier than that, but it
don’t want to make this blog too
explicit. But it was apparently
affirmation that got him excited.
Or even consider why he was
sending direct messages to young girls. Now
I want to be clear. I am not saying that
Weiner ever did anything illegal with a young girl. We just don’t know. But when Patterico released the evidence that
Weiner was sending direct messages to that young girl, Ace of Spades had an excellent
analysis of what it meant. But you have
to understand his nomenclature a little bit.
Ace likened “pedophilic cybersex” to “murder” and then said there was
another possibility, which he termed “manslaughter.” Something not illegal, but still creepy:
And so here's a 17
year old. Likes to talk about sex publicly on Twitter. Pretty cute. Kind of
girl you'd like if you were yourself 17 years old, and not a particularly
handsome sort of 17 year old, but an awkward, skinny funny-looking kind of guy.
Girl that that awkward, skinny, funny-looking 17 year old never could have
gotten.
But now she says she
"loves" him. And he does enjoy the validation of infatuated women.
Who doesn't?
But she's not a
woman. She's a 17 year old girl. She
is, for legal purposes, a child.
In the Manslaughter
theory, he never says anything legally actionable in his private communications
with her -- and yes, he seems to have had them. Rather, he just enjoys the
crush-vibes he gets from her, flattered that a pretty young thing could be in
"love" with a still-not-confident-and-mature boy-man like him.
Sure, he deflects
away her serious protestations of love, but he doesn't say anything legally
actionable. He just... enjoys the flattery of a pretty 17 year old who's in
love with him.
Perfectly innocent.
Except it's not
innocent. It's not innocent.
Because there is no
one reading this right now who, if I were to suggest a similar scenario with an
adult just seeking out their daughter's private
attention, doing nothing actually illegal but just enjoying the fact the girl
had a major league crush on him... well, there would be problems. Real
problems.
You don't have to
prove someone's a criminal to know he's a creep.
And indeed you should read the whole thing. Politicians get into politics for a number of
different reasons. One of those
sometimes is that without power they feel, well... impotent. It’s about their psychological needs, rather
than their belief they can actually help the community (which is the right
reason to go into politics). The problem
with politicians like that is that if they are driven by their psychological
needs to run for office, then when they get in office they act out in an
unhealthy way. Weiner is only one
example of this.
Recently, Weiner has started his
attempt at achieving resurrection with a fluff
interview with the New York Times. A
hard news story might have asked him point blank for copies of those direct
messages to that underage girl, but they didn’t bother with that. Instead they tried to convince us that Weiner
has changed:
But nearly everyone
who cares about Weiner says that pugilistic political persona long ago bled
into his personal life and made him “hard to take,” as his brother Jason puts
it. “I wouldn’t stand for other people saying this about him, but there was
definitely a douchiness about him that I just don’t really see anymore.” His
family agrees that the post-scandal Weiner, the diaper-changing Weiner, is far
more likable. “No one has been harder on him than he has been on himself,”
Jason says. “I find that refreshing, because he was always — in his political
career, and it was sort of overflowing into his personal life — this completely
decisive, ‘this is the right thing because this is what I’m doing.’ It’s like
this circular reasoning that was kind of hubristic. He doesn’t have that
anymore. The irony is that it could make him a better politician.”
But if the underlying issue in
the admittedly hilarious scandal that brought him down was a sense of ego that
needed um... stroking by women who were not his wife, then the question is
whether that he has gotten over that need.
This logo would suggest he has
not.
---------------------------------------
My wife and I have lost our jobs
due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an
attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up
to ten years. I know that claim sounds
fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these
claims using documentary and video evidence.
If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin
accountable, please hit the Blogger’s Defense Team button on the right. And thank you.
Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing,
mostly for snark and site updates. And
you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent
History here.
And you can read a little more about my novel, here.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused some people,
particularly Brett Kimberlin, of
reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even
criminal. In all cases, the only justice I want is through the
appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system. I do not want to see vigilante violence
against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the particular case of Brett
Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part
because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want
that to happen to him.
And for that matter, don’t go on
his property. Don’t sneak around and try
to photograph him. Frankly try not to
even be within his field of vision. Your
behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to
mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not contact his
organizations, either. And most of all, leave his family alone.
The only exception to all that is
that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with
contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might
report. And even then if he tells you to
stop contacting him, obey that request. That
this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that
a person asks you to stop and you refuse.
And let me say something
else. In my heart of hearts, I don’t
believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
No comments:
Post a Comment