The Brett Kimberlin Saga:

Follow this link to my BLOCKBUSTER STORY of how Brett Kimberlin, a convicted terrorist and perjurer, attempted to frame me for a crime, and then got me arrested for blogging when I exposed that misconduct to the world. That sounds like an incredible claim, but I provide primary documents and video evidence proving that he did this. And if you are moved by this story to provide a little help to myself and other victims of Mr. Kimberlin’s intimidation, such as Robert Stacy McCain, you can donate at the PayPal buttons on the right. And I thank everyone who has done so, and will do so.

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Meghan McCain Angry at South Carolinians... for Following Her Advice

So tonight in South Carolina, Mark Sanford achieved ressurrection won a special erection election.  (Darn typos.)

Now let me start by saying that Sanford should have been run out of politics forever, period.  It’s not just that he cheated, though that is bad enough.  It’s also the fact he abandoned his post.  There were several days in which literally no one knew where he was.  On that day he decided that boning his girlfriend was more important than doing his job.  We should make sure his job never gets in the way of that again.

So while I guess he was marginally better than Elizabeth Colbert Busch, it was still a lousy choice.  I joked on twitter the slogan should have been “vote for the louse, it’s important” a throwback to when Edwin Edwards ran for governor against David Duke, with some wags putting up bumper stickers that said, “vote for the crook, it’s important.”  Just as Edwards had no business being in politics, he was better than the other choice (though I don’t want to suggest Ms. Busch was as bad as Duke by a long shot).

Still watching the left screech about it on twitter was delicious, delicious fun.  And none more so than Meghan McCain, who said this:

And if you look up the tweet, you will see she is plainly talking about the Sanford election.  Of course the most hilarious response to this was from Iowahawk:

Ouch.  He knew he had a winner of a tweet:

Could her entire career be all about daddy issues?  Well, the alternate explanations are no dumber.

But less funny but more damning is the fact that she wrote an editorial on the Sanford scandal back when.  And what was the title of the article? Forgive Mark Sanford.

Yep, read the whole thing.  It is just as bad and hypocritical as it gets.

Could there be any further proof that she just reflexively hates Republicans now?  She asks them to forgive him and they do, and she rages that this means that you can lie and cheat and get back in politics.

Only one of those sentiments might be correct.


My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years.  I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video evidence.  If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the Blogger’s Defense Team button on the right.  And thank you.

Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for snark and site updates.  And you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.  And you can read a little more about my novel, here.



I have accused some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct.  In some cases, the conduct is even criminal.  In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system.  I do not want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such violence.  This kind of conduct is not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.

In the particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him.  Do not call him.  Do not write him a letter.  Do not write him an email.  Do not text-message him.  Do not engage in any kind of directed communication.  I say this in part because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.

And for that matter, don’t go on his property.  Don’t sneak around and try to photograph him.  Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision.  Your behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).

And do not contact his organizations, either.  And most of all, leave his family alone.

The only exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might report.  And even then if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request.  That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.

And let me say something else.  In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above.  But if any of you have, stop it, and if you haven’t don’t start.

1 comment: