The Brett Kimberlin Saga:

Follow this link to my BLOCKBUSTER STORY of how Brett Kimberlin, a convicted terrorist and perjurer, attempted to frame me for a crime, and then got me arrested for blogging when I exposed that misconduct to the world. That sounds like an incredible claim, but I provide primary documents and video evidence proving that he did this. And if you are moved by this story to provide a little help to myself and other victims of Mr. Kimberlin’s intimidation, such as Robert Stacy McCain, you can donate at the PayPal buttons on the right. And I thank everyone who has done so, and will do so.

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

EXCLUSIVE: My Motion to Require Convicted Perjurer Brett Kimberlin to Verify his Filings in the RICO Suit

This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®.  If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not everyone reads my blog.  The short version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over a year, his worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime.   I recognize that this might sound like an incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in other words, you don’t have to believe my word.  You only have to believe your eyes.  So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.

Update: Now I have posted all the documents I intend to post in the short term, let me update all of these posts with where you can find each.  This is a generic update, so some of these links will be to this post.  My basic motion to dismiss is here, but it’s barely worth reading—it literally just says that the case should be dismissed for all the reasons stated in my memorandum of points of authorities.  So that memorandum is the meat, and that is here.  Next I have a motion to require verification, here, and finally I have a memorandum aimed at convincing a judge to let whoever Kimberlin Unmasked is preserve his/her/their anonymity.  And finally we see DB Capital Stategies’ motion to dismiss.  And that is it, for now.

You are really, really going to want to get out the popcorn for this one.

So I shared with you my motion to dismiss and the reasoning behind it, but I also pointed in my last post out that at this stage we have to treat all of his proper allegations as true, which is annoying because we are dealing with a convicted perjurer and indeed a shameless liar.  “Is there any way we can communicate that to the judge?” you might ask, “Is there any way we can make him face some real consequences if he keeps lying in this suit?”

Gosh, dear reader, you are asking some good questions.

Humor aside, with all that in mind, I present “Defendant Walker’s Motion to Require the Plaintiff to File Verified Papers in Future Filings.”  And what does that mean?  Well, I think you will understand by the end of it.

Don’t let the length freak you out.  Most of this is just exhibits.  The motion itself is 21 pages.

Now you will notice that towards the end of the document, I have a couple video exhibits.  Yeah, I had to burn them onto DVD’s—one for the court and one for each of the mailings.  And for you good people, here’s what I embedded.  Really, regular readers will find little of this surprising.

Anyway, for your convenience, this is Exhibit V, security footage from the January 9, 2012 incident where I supposedly assaulted him:

And this is Exhibit W, an interview Patrick Frey (aka Patterico) did with Glenn Beck:

By the way, since I spend a lot of time in the motion comparing what happened on January 9, 2012, to what the convicted terrorist and perjurer Brett Kimberlin says about it, perhaps you would prefer this much better presentation of pretty much the same information (and also introducing the world to Brett Kimberlin if you didn’t know about him already):

Anyway, I will let the documents, videos, etc. speak for themselves.  The facts have always been my friend in this.

Next up: what I filed in Maryland State court on the same day.  Really Brett should have looked at a calendar before he filed this suit.  He is going to have to respond to all these documents right through Christmas.  And he has no one to blame for this, but his own stupid self.


Side bar: Given that lying to the FBI is obstruction of justice, what did Brett do when he allegedly delivered a copy of his complaint to the FBI?  I mean, unless he said to them, “I filed this, but really its bull____,” wouldn’t that be lying to the Feds?  And yes, lying to the Feds is a crime.  How do you think Martha Stewart got in trouble, or Scooter Libby?  It just isn’t a predicate offense under RICO as a rule (with some exceptions).



I have accused some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct.  In some cases, the conduct is even criminal.  In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system.  I do not want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such violence.  This kind of conduct is not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.

In the particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him.  Do not call him.  Do not write him a letter.  Do not write him an email.  Do not text-message him.  Do not engage in any kind of directed communication.  I say this in part because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.

And for that matter, don’t go on his property.  Don’t sneak around and try to photograph him.  Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision.  Your behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).

And do not contact his organizations, either.  And most of all, leave his family alone.

The only exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might report.  And even then if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request.  That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.

And let me say something else.  In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above.  But if any of you have, stop it, and if you haven’t don’t start.

No comments:

Post a Comment