This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®. If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not
everyone reads my blog. The short
version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over two years, his worst
conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime. I recognize that this might sound like an
incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in
other words, you don’t have to believe my word.
You only have to believe your eyes.
So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.
Update: This is not the first time Brett Kimberlin has, on record, demonstrated bigotry toward me. Go here and read about the last time.
Well, dear reader, we are going to have a last minute programming change. Yesterday, I said I would share my reply to Brett Kimberlin’s opposition to my motion to dismiss. I also said that I wasn’t going to share my motion for a leave to exceed the page limitations. That was my intention, but sometimes events take over and plans change.
Well, dear reader, we are going to have a last minute programming change. Yesterday, I said I would share my reply to Brett Kimberlin’s opposition to my motion to dismiss. I also said that I wasn’t going to share my motion for a leave to exceed the page limitations. That was my intention, but sometimes events take over and plans change.
You see, two
things happened today. First, the
judge’s order granting my motion for leave to exceed the page limit was posted
on PACER. Truly, that was no big whoop
or any big surprise. Here’s the order:
So the judge
said, more or less, “yeah, this is a complex case, and you aren’t going over by
much so go ahead.” Again, nothing surprising,
there. And it said Brett had fourteen
days in which to oppose it...
...which would
be stupid, because it would come off as petty and silly unless he had some
great grounds to oppose. So the last
thing an intelligent person would do would be to oppose it... and he certainly
wouldn’t oppose it on whiny, non-factual grounds, right? Right?
Well of course Brett filed an opposition, and... it is a piece of work. I will have an opportunity to reply to it
(indeed, since I haven’t been served yet, the clock isn’t ticking on it just yet),
but some of the claims in it are just silly.
For instance, he writes that every single motion I have ever filed against
him was denied, which is false. And he
falsely claims that each post is asking for people to send me money, when in
fact I have never written a post asking anyone
to send me money. Yes, I have asked you
to send money to others, particularly legal defense funds (psst, donate to BomberSuesBloggers, please!), but not to me. And the part about the Scarlett Letter is
just too hilarious for words. Can you say "persecution complex?"
And of course
his claim that I am engaged in unauthorized practice of law is just silly. I have never pretended to represent anyone’s
interests but my own.
So now it is
necessary to show you my motion for leave to exceed the page limit, which you
can read here:
Really, truly,
this document is not interesting except
that it shows you what he was opposing.
And you can see his opposition, here:
Normally I would
wait until my response is filed so his allegations are rebutted at the same
time they are presented, but seriously, dear reader, they rebut themselves. I actually laughed out loud reading some of
it.
And yes, I noticed
the way he has proven himself to be a bigot before the court. That will not go unnoticed or un-commented-on
when I file my reply.
And given the
way I have hammered him recently for his bad faith, was this really a smart time to tell
provable lies to the court? (Hint: no.)
So that is it for today. Tomorrow, you will finally get to see my reply to his opposition to my motion to dismiss that made him scream like a little girl in this filing. Seriously, he's like a little girl who thinks if she whines long enough she will get her way, another poor choice in strategy on his part.
---------------------------------------
My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted
terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame
me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years. I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you
read starting here,
you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video
evidence. If you would like to help in
the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on
the right. And thank you.
Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing,
mostly for snark and site updates. And
you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel:
A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.
And you can read a little more about my
novel, here.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused
some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even criminal. In all cases, the only justice I want is
through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system. I do not want to see vigilante violence
against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the
particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed communication. I say this in part because under Maryland
law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.
And for that
matter, don’t go on his property. Don’t
sneak around and try to photograph him.
Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision. Your behavior could quickly cross the line
into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not
contact his organizations, either. And
most of all, leave his family alone.
The only
exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course
nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any
stories you might report. And even then
if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request. That this is a key element in making out a
harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you
refuse.
And let me say
something else. In my heart of hearts, I
don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
Such a display of psychopathology!
ReplyDeleteHoly carp.
ReplyDeleteWhen I first saw he filed a response to your motion to exceed the page limit, I thought it would be the traditional (and absurd) legal arguments. Sure, they can be done, but usually you're just making yourself look bad.
This is just insane.
Maybe you should move for the court to appoint a lawyer to represent Kimberlin's interests. He seems to be incapable of competently representing himself.
This is hilarious, although of course I'm speaking from someone on the outside. If I had to put up with this in the court system, I believe I would be saying it sucks. Kudos to you, Mr. Walker. God will provide justice for you by simply allowing Kimberlin to keep talking. :-D
ReplyDeletewell, from my perspective, it sucks on some level but... its also pretty hilarious. Look, I have had many Jewish friends growing up and I have learned from them the important coping mechanism of finding something funny in everything as i previously talked about here: http://allergic2bull.blogspot.com/2012/05/friday-frivolity-i-am-dude-who-stands.html
DeleteAnd yes, Brett did not help himself with his little Passion play.
Memo to Kimberlin: Little girls are cute. You're a despicable creep. Bawling ain't gonna work.
ReplyDelete