My Opposition to Convicted Perjurer and Document Forger Brett Kimberlin’s Latest Attempt to Get an Anti-First-Amendment Injunction

This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga^®.  If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not everyone reads my blog.  The short version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over two years, his worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime.   I recognize that this might sound like an incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in other words, you don’t have to believe my word.  You only have to believe your eyes.  So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.

I think this finally gets us through the blizzard of documents filed a few weeks ago in the continuing legal saga of Brett Kimberlin’s attempts to abuse the courts to shut others up.  I’ll check my records later, but I believe this is the last one.

Which doesn’t mean you will necessarily be starved for documents.  Just today a new one popped up where it turns out that Brett’s motion to disqualify Paul Levy was sent back to Brett unconsidered, because it was filed without leave.  John Hoge has that document, here.

As I said in the comments at John’s blog, that activity still leaves outstanding the issue of granting an extension.  Of course the original grounds of the extension—“I need an extension while this court considers the awesomeness of my motion to disqualify”—has had its feet cut out from under it by the fact that the motion to disqualify is no longer on the table.  And the logic of returning the motion to disqualify suggests that the motion for an extension should equally be dismissed out of hand.  As I said at John’s blog (with unmarked corrections):

I can see one of 3 scenarios:

1) There is or will be another form letter or letters where Brett’s motions for extension and the other documents are returned.

2) The judge is writing a short letter opinion chewing Brett out for filing without leave, perhaps as part of the larger case management order that should be arriving any day now.

3) The judge is still going to give Brett a mulligan and give him an extra day or two to get his response to Levy in, either because a) he is willing to give Brett the benefit of the doubt [that Brett misunderstood the judge] on the leave issue, or b) he just wants to show the court of appeals he gave Brett every opportunity before dropping the hammer on him.

I am frankly unsure which of the three are about to happen.  Given that the courts typically have a pretty significant lag on Mondays, and on this past Monday there was a snow day, presumably lengthening the lag, it could be that the answer is already in the case file and it just hasn’t appeared on PACER yet.

But this post is not about the ongoing Federal RICO case, but on the lawsuit he has filed against us in state court where he claims that we hypnotized his wife, or something, into accusing him of seducing her when she was fourteen and bringing her to Maryland to repeatedly have sex with her when she was fifteen, in violation of several state and federal laws.  And once again, Brett has tried to file another injunction trying to shut us up again.

So today’s document is my attorney’s response to Brett Kimberlin’s previously posted motion for preliminary injunction.  This is mostly Mr. Ostronic’s fine work, although you can certainly see my “fingerprints” on the document, particularly obviously in the case of formatting.  Still, I will mostly let it speak for itself, below the fold:

   Walker PrelimInjunction Opposition

So that is it for the foreseeable future, but we should have some activity soon.  And besides other events are happening this week which might be fun to pay attention to.

---------------------------------------

My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years.  I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video evidence.  If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on the right.  And thank you.

Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for snark and site updates.  And you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.  And you can read a little more about my novel, here.

---------------------------------------

Disclaimer:

I have accused some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct.  In some cases, the conduct is even criminal.  In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system.  I do not want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such violence.  This kind of conduct is not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.

In the particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him.  Do not call him.  Do not write him a letter.  Do not write him an email.  Do not text-message him.  Do not engage in any kind of directed communication.  I say this in part because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.

And for that matter, don’t go on his property.  Don’t sneak around and try to photograph him.  Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision.  Your behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).

And do not contact his organizations, either.  And most of all, leave his family alone.

The only exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might report.  And even then if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request.  That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.

And let me say something else.  In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above.  But if any of you have, stop it, and if you haven’t don’t start.