But his op-ed on Citizens United is crap.
Of course you can read my argument on the subject, here. Or just scroll down, you lazy bastard!
So let’s start reading together, shall we?
The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision holding that corporations and unions can spend unlimited amounts of money in election campaigns...
Okay stop right there. This is dishonest. The FEC told Citizens United that it could not purchase advertising. So to frame this as being about spending, without noticing that the spending purchases speech is dishonest.
I mean imagine if we passed a law stating that the New York Times was forbidden from buying paper or ink. Would that be a restriction on commerce? Or would that be a restriction on the freedom of the press?
This isn’t a restriction merely on expenditures. This is a restriction on expression. Remember that.