Just to walk down memory lane,
here’s his press conference from 2011:
And while we are at it, let’s remember
how Andrew Breitbart hijacked that press conference just minutes before:
And now we have today’s latest
promise that this will never happen again:
Meanwhile, via Twitchy we get
word from Emily
Miller that there might be even more women coming forward. But even if this is the only one, Aaron Blake
over at the Washington Post has this
devastating point:
Anthony Weiner
basically knew this day would come: the day his sexual chats with women who
were not his wife are released for all in the public to view.
But one of the most
damning aspect of the whole episode over the past 24 hours — in addition to the
bombshell admission that he kept engaging in these relationships after his
resignation — is the irresistible shorthand we all now have for Weiner’s
indiscretions:
Carlos Danger.
What Blake is getting at is the
idea that Weiner knew or should have known this day of humiliation would occur,
so why did he pick such a ridiculous name as his persona? Either he is actively self-destructive or he
is a colossal idiot who lacks the judgment to recognize how this stuff will
look to others. He has previously said,
in that prior press conference, that this is self-destruction.
Anthony Weiner is a deeply
damaged human being. He really needs to
go and be on his own for a long time and straighten himself out. He needs to stay out of politics and probably
stay off the internet, generally.
By the way, will anyone ask if he
keep his paramours above eighteen?
At the same time, Pete “DaTechGuy”
is exploring another angle: how
Weiner promised his paramour a job at Politico.
And over at Buzzfeed,
Andrew Kaczynski points out that this cyberaffair had been going on for a week
before he met with People magazine. Read
the whole thing, but here’s a key passage:
“Anthony has spent
every day since [the scandal] trying to be the best dad and husband he can be,”
his wife said. “I’m proud to be married to him.”
Bluntly it is hard to see Huma as
anything but a woman who is in a marriage of convenience at this point.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused some people,
particularly Brett Kimberlin, of
reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even
criminal. In all cases, the only justice I want is through the
appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system. I do not want to see vigilante violence
against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the particular case of Brett
Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part
because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want
that to happen to him.
And for that matter, don’t go on
his property. Don’t sneak around and try
to photograph him. Frankly try not to
even be within his field of vision. Your
behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to
mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not contact his
organizations, either. And most of all, leave his family alone.
The only exception to all that is
that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with
contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might
report. And even then if he tells you to
stop contacting him, obey that request. That
this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that
a person asks you to stop and you refuse.
And let me say something
else. In my heart of hearts, I don’t
believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
The sort of psychological disease he has (sociopath) has a "cure" rate lower than the 4% to 8% of narcotic addiction. And he has had no treatment, and probably won't. His is a hopeless case. New York and him, Perfect together.
ReplyDeleteTwo points. You said, "Either he is actively self-destructive or he is a colossal idiot who lacks the judgment to recognize how this stuff will look to others."
ReplyDeleteThis is not an "either-or" proposition. He is obviously a self-destructive, colossal idiot who thinks he is so much smarter than everyone else that he can get away with it indefinitely. And he may yet be proven right at least as far as residents of New York City are concerned.
Second point. You said, "Huma ... is in a marriage of convenience." What part of being married to Anthony Weiner would be "convenient." She is a Muslim from a Muslim family with deep ties to terrorist organizations who is married to a loathsome person and may well be or have been involved in a romantic relationship with one of the Clintons. (The irony being here that Bill and Hillary may have only two things in common: Chelsea and that they both prefer women.) I would not describe this relationship with Weiner as "convenient."
Weiner is incapable of Shame. He is a lying pervert.
ReplyDeleteOf course. He is a Democrat. That's what Democrats do. That what Democrats are.
Delete