The news in all is that all of
this was allegedly after his scandal, these communications stretching into 2012. So even
after he was busted he was allegedly still doing this, and it makes us wonder 1) if there
are more women out there, and 2) if there will be more women if he becomes
mayor. I think this has seriously deflated
his erectoral campaign.
And as is the case with much of
Weiner’s scandals, there is an element of the ridiculous involved, in that he
allegedly used the fake name "Carlos Danger."
That is why [Weiner] constantly sought the affirmation of women
besides his wife. I mean let’s remember something: he didn’t actually
have sex with other women (as far as we know). As Bill Maher pointed out
in this very funny clip, mechanically speaking, it was masturbation not
sex[.]
[youtube video omitted]
In other words, this was not women providing
pleasure to him by their bodies. Their bodies were often thousands of
miles away. This was their words providing him some kind
of sexual gratification. Alec Baldwin, in a rather pathetic defense of
Weiner, managed to put his finger on it in the midst of it all:
For high functioning men like Weiner and other
officials who have lived through such scandals, who are constantly on the go,
that leaves one tried and true source of a reliable high. The affirmation that
comes when someone lets you know they want to sleep with you. Or even
cyber-sleep with you.
And if you force yourself to read some of
those cybersex conversations, you will see they are filled with that need for
affirmation, to be told by a woman that he is a stud, well-endowed, etc.
It gets gnarlier than that, but it don’t want to make this blog too explicit.
But it was apparently affirmation that got him excited.
So does sound like him.
As for more direct verification,
Weiner has admitted that some of this is true, but won’t say what is and isn’t. From his official statement, published by Business
Insider, via the National Review’s feed:
“I said that other
texts and photos were likely to come out, and today they have," Weiner
said in a statement released by his campaign Tuesday afternoon.
"As I have said
in the past, these things that I did were wrong and hurtful to my wife and
caused us to go through challenges in our marriage that extended past my
resignation from Congress. While some things that have been posted today are true
and some are not, there is no question that what I did was wrong. This behavior
is behind me. I've apologized to Huma and am grateful that she has worked
through these issues with me and for her forgiveness. I want to again say that
I am very sorry to anyone who was on the receiving end of these messages and
the disruption that this has caused. As my wife and I have said, we are focused
on moving forward.”
As the Business Insider article
notes, this doesn’t tell us when the texts were. Were they before or after his resignation
from Congress? She says they were
exchanging messages as late as August of last year.
Seriously, has Weiner learned
nothing from his last trip on the scandal merry-go-round? His response only created more
questions. He says he wants to move
forward, but he won’t be able to until all of the questions are answered.
This is a breaking story and you
should expect updates. It looks like his
attempt to achieve resurrection is facing its toughest challenge yet. Indeed, I wonder if this will make his
support finally go soft.
Update: Presented without comment other famous characters with the
name “danger” in their names:
Okay, one comment: heh. Hat tip to Conservative
Animal for the second idea.
Update (II): Jim Geraghty makes another hilarious connection, via Twitchy:
Now that silly Lifetime movie's title makes sense. pic.twitter.com/M25UkVfseg
— jimgeraghty (@jimgeraghty) July 23, 2013
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused some people,
particularly Brett Kimberlin, of
reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even
criminal. In all cases, the only justice I want is through the
appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system. I do not want to see vigilante violence
against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the particular case of Brett
Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part
because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want
that to happen to him.
And for that matter, don’t go on
his property. Don’t sneak around and try
to photograph him. Frankly try not to
even be within his field of vision. Your
behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to
mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not contact his
organizations, either. And most of all, leave his family alone.
The only exception to all that is
that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with
contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might
report. And even then if he tells you to
stop contacting him, obey that request. That
this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that
a person asks you to stop and you refuse.
And let me say something
else. In my heart of hearts, I don’t
believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
Minor correction: Weinergate I happened in 2011, not 2012. Andrew Breitbart was alive.
ReplyDelete