The Brett Kimberlin Saga:

Follow this link to my BLOCKBUSTER STORY of how Brett Kimberlin, a convicted terrorist and perjurer, attempted to frame me for a crime, and then got me arrested for blogging when I exposed that misconduct to the world. That sounds like an incredible claim, but I provide primary documents and video evidence proving that he did this. And if you are moved by this story to provide a little help to myself and other victims of Mr. Kimberlin’s intimidation, such as Robert Stacy McCain, you can donate at the PayPal buttons on the right. And I thank everyone who has done so, and will do so.

Friday, February 21, 2014

Friday Frivolity: Baghdad Blob Makes an Appearance in Convicted Terrorist Brett Kimberlin’s Silly RICO Suit

This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®.  If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not everyone reads my blog.  The short version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over two years, his worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime.   I recognize that this might sound like an incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in other words, you don’t have to believe my word.  You only have to believe your eyes.  So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.


I haven’t done a Friday frivolity for a while, but really it is hard to get more frivolous than this.

Baghdad Blob is one of the nicknames I have given to adjudicated harasser Bill Schmalfeldt.  I say that because it highlights why I am convinced that he is Brett Kimberlin’s employee.  Like the Iraqi Information minister, his “analysis” and news is skewed to the point of ignoring reality.  He will continue to accuse people of misconduct at the same time he is accusing other people of doing what he claimed you did.  He is not even slightly interested in the truth.  He is interested in hurting Brett Kimberlin’s enemies.  Now, no one ever wondered if Baghdad Bob was being paid by the regime, or that being so paid, they purchased his integrity.  So why should we wonder if Baghdad Blob is being paid; the very one-sidedness of his coverage, his declaration that we are all guilty of Brett’s claims, that Brett’s suit is wonderful, even as Brett implicitly admits in court documents that he is in trouble, while declaring he will not pass on the truth or falsity of the claims in Malkin and Twitchy’s motion to dismiss, tells you all you need to know.  The man is not even putting very much effort into faking fairness and balance.

And speaking of unbalanced, we have our document of the day.  Better known as docket #63, it is a letter that Bill Schmalfeldt wrote to the court.  As John Hoge correctly said, “Some things are so ludicrous and immaterial as to not be worth a reply.”  Yes, but it is worth pointing and laughing at.

So all together now:

The lamest thing is that it will never make it to the judge’s desk.  It would actually be reversible error to consider it even slightly.  Which is probably good for Brett, because the judge is like to wonder who is this lunatic on Brett’s side.

Anyway, that is it for today.  Next on Monday, I promise one of the really cool/interesting documents.  And if things come together, I might even have filed some new things by then.  There are things afoot that I know of, that Brett is really going to hate when he sees it.  Because to him you’re just not allowed to defend yourself.  You’re just supposed to let him win.

And we have not been cooperating with that plan.


My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years.  I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video evidence.  If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on the right.  And thank you.

Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for snark and site updates.  And you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.  And you can read a little more about my novel, here.



I have accused some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct.  In some cases, the conduct is even criminal.  In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system.  I do not want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such violence.  This kind of conduct is not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.

In the particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him.  Do not call him.  Do not write him a letter.  Do not write him an email.  Do not text-message him.  Do not engage in any kind of directed communication.  I say this in part because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.

And for that matter, don’t go on his property.  Don’t sneak around and try to photograph him.  Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision.  Your behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).

And do not contact his organizations, either.  And most of all, leave his family alone.

The only exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might report.  And even then if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request.  That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.

And let me say something else.  In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above.  But if any of you have, stop it, and if you haven’t don’t start.


  1. Keep smacking the lying liar that lies my friend and I'll keep applauding!

  2. I think there needs to be one less "accuse" and one more "excuse" in your first body paragraph.

    1. no, i was unclear.

      I am talking about the norton incident. He accused Seth of trespass. Then he accused Norton of the same incident trespass, without taking down his accusation against Seth. But i can totally see how you could read it that way: because I was not being clear enough. :-/ I'll try to fix later.

  3. John was right. Not worth a reply or a comment.

  4. Even if full of lies, the letter is written in a very sympathetic manner, and suggests bad faith on the part of Hoge. If the judge is aware of a new docket item, he might read the letter. While you're correct it would be reversible error to consider the letter, it might sway the judge slightly. A failure to object may waive your ability to raise the issue on appeal.

    Have either of you considered a motion to strike? If so, I think you might want to keep it short that the letter is irrelevant and attempting to introduce testimony inconsistent with the Rules of Evidence.

    BS is a non-party, and his comment holds no weight. If a party to the suit wants to introduce BS's testimony, they can do so according to the proper procedure.

  5. Schmalfeldt is just a damn liar. He greatly misrepresents the Peace Order fiasco. I have never heard of "hundreds of right wing bloggers" calling any Maryland court, nor have I heard of anyone orchestrating such an event. I suspect this scenario is just another of Schmalfeldt's many delusions.

  6. Remarkable. One almost expects his letter to include a sketch, captioned "this is where the bad people hurt me."

    It would be a sketch of his butt, of course.

  7. What is the definition of insanity? Trying something time and again, hoping for a different result.

    Oh, and did I read Cassidy again in that hot mess of a letter?