This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly
call The Kimberlin Saga®. If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not
everyone reads my blog. The short
version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over two years, his worst
conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime. I recognize that this might sound like an
incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in
other words, you don’t have to believe my word.
You only have to believe your eyes.
So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.
Well, the hits
just keep coming, don’t they? As I said this
morning, Brett’s motion for an extension of time to reply to Levy’s fairly
devastating opposition to his motion for discovery of Ace’s identity was still
outstanding. Well, now it no longer is
outstand: Brett lost that motion.
In that post I
imagined three different scenarios. I am
somewhat surprised to get a fourth possible outcome: a very restrained short order
denying the motion. I figured if the
judge was likely to deny it that he would do so based on the fact Brett didn’t
seek leave first. Instead, he considered
it “on the merits” and found that there were no merits. I mean that literally. From the order:
I
note that the motion relies on Plaintiff’s filing of a motion to disqualify
counsel, which has been stricken and returned as improperly filed under my
Letter Order of February 21, 2014, ECF No. 88.
Accordingly, I find that there is no basis for an extension[.]
This lines up
with what I said this morning, specifically that:
the original grounds of the extension—“I need an extension while this
court considers the awesomeness of my motion to disqualify”—has had its feet
cut out from under it by the fact that the motion to disqualify is no longer on
the table. And the logic of returning the motion to disqualify suggests
that the motion for an extension should equally be dismissed out of hand.
It is strange
for the judge to issue an order, rather than just send back the document like what
happened with the motion to disqualify but the upshot is the same: Brett needs
to respond to Ace’s Opposition, or leave their claims unanswered (and they were
pretty devastating, including pointing out that Brett’s enemies tend to be
SWATted and that he is defamation-proof).
This is also a
further sign that the judge is getting sick of the case. I frankly expected the judge to give Brett a “mulligan”
and give him an extra day or two. I am
therefore surprised that the judge is starting to get harsh with Brett even if
he didn’t chew him out for his double violation of the Letter Order. One can never predict the future, but I am
cautiously optimistic that the judge will get rid of this the first chance he
gets, without creating an issue for appeal.
As noted by
one twitter wag noted that Bill “Baghdad Blob” Schmalfeldt had unprotected his
twitter account at an inopportune time:
@stephensheiko
@Katiescarlet2
@AaronWorthing
@wjjhoge @rsmccain @ali Funny he unprotected
his acct the day Kimby gets kicked in the jimmies
— army_vet
(@antvq16) March
5, 2014
And I made a
correction:
To be fair, Brett was kicked in the jimmies
yesterday, too @antvq16 @stephensheiko
@Katiescarlet2
@wjjhoge @rsmccain @ali
—
Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) March
5, 2014
So that would
be getting “kicked in the jimmies*” twice in one day. Heh.
Anyway, I will
post the entire thing momentarily, but really there is nothing more to it than what
I just told you.
Stay tuned for
any further developments.
Update: You can read the order, below
the fold, for what it’s worth:
So ball’s in
Brett’s court. Will he get his reply
in? Was he smart enough to have drafted
one already? And does it comply with the
judge’s case management order issued today?
---------------------------------------
* That means “in
the beanbag,” right? Right?
---------------------------------------
My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted
terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame
me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years. I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you
read starting here,
you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video
evidence. If you would like to help in
the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on
the right. And thank you.
Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing,
mostly for snark and site updates. And
you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel:
A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.
And you can read a little more about my
novel, here.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused
some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even
criminal. In all cases, the only justice
I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice
system. I do not want to see vigilante
violence against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the particular
case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part
because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want
that to happen to him.
And for that
matter, don’t go on his property. Don’t
sneak around and try to photograph him.
Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision. Your behavior could quickly cross the line
into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not
contact his organizations, either. And
most of all, leave his family alone.
The only
exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course
nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any
stories you might report. And even then
if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request. That this is a key element in making out a
harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you
refuse.
And let me say
something else. In my heart of hearts, I
don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
No comments:
Post a Comment