This is the latest post in what I
half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®. If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not
everyone reads my blog. The short
version is that convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin has been harassing me for
over three years, his worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a
crime. I recognize that this might sound
like an incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that
fact; in other words, you don’t have to believe my word. You only have to believe your eyes. Indeed, he sued me for saying this and lost
on the issue of truth. And more recently
when his wife came to us claiming that this convicted terrorist had threatened
her harm, we tried to help her leave him, and for that, he sued myself, John
Hoge, Robert Stacy McCain and Ali Akbar for helping his wife and he is suing
Hoge, McCain, Akbar, DB Capital Strategies, Michelle Malkin, Glenn Beck,
Patrick “Patterico” Frey, Mandy Nagy, Lee Stranahan, Erick Erickson,
Breitbart.com, the Blaze, Mercury Radio Arts, Red State, the National Bloggers
Club, and others alleging that we are
all in organized crime for reporting factually about the spate of SWATtings
committed against myself, Frey and Erickson.
So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has
been happening.
Always enjoy popcorn when I show you how Brett Kimberlin shot himself in foot in front of the court... |
I didn’t plan
it this way, but this is turning into an embarrassment of riches this week in
the latest lawsuit Brett Kimberlin has filed against me. Yesterday, I shared
with you Kimberlin’s latest dumb motion to dismiss and delved deeper into his
psyche (shiver). Today I share my
official opposition to his motion to strike.
That is separate from my motion to strike, because where the motion to
strike was based on his failure to provide service, this is based on the
merits, or lackt thereof, don’t worry, dear reader, it is popcorn-worthy.™ I mean
there isn’t really much to say about whether I can 1) file a MTD immediately,
or 2) represent myself, but there is a lot to say about how wrong the Plaintiff
is to even raise the argument. So...
enjoy:
As per usual,
it is the same thing I filed except 1) it is not signed or notorized and 2)
some personal information has been redacted.
And since I had more time to respond, I mailed it, instead of driving up
there and filing it.
Now, yesterday
I delved deep into Brett Kimberlin’s psyche, to see what might be driving some
of his unique hatred of me. But it only
seems fair to ask, well, why do I dislike him?
Is it some trauma or some aspect of growing up?
Pictured: the reason why I don't like terrorism |
Well,
yes. For instance, I dislike terrorists
because of an incident you might have heard of around fourteen years ago. You see, on September 11, 2001, terrorists
attacked my country and, while I was never a fan of them to start, those events
cemented my belief that terrorists are some of the scummiest people on earth.
And why do I like
free speech and hate every attempt to suppress it by violence? Well, it comes from how I was raised. You see, every morning my class would say:
I
pledge Allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the
Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty
and Justice for all.
But you should read his two treatises on government... and smoke monsters! |
Also I was
influenced by documents such as the Declaration of Independence, and even the
Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Over time, I was equally influenced by the words of Abraham Lincoln and
John Locke (the philosopher, not the character on Lost, though he was pretty cool, too), along with other sources.
Pictured: Brett Kimberlin's greatest nightmare... |
And why do I hate
pedophiles? I may not have any children
of my own, but most people have young girls in their families that we love and
want to see protected, and recoil at the thought of some old pervert feeling
lust toward them, let alone hurting them.
And because f—k pedophiles.
On top of
that, I am not particularly pleased with how he has exhibited bigotry toward my
friends, my wife and I, or how he stalked my wife, or how
he tried to frame me for a crime, to name a few issues.
In other
words, for me this isn’t about psychological needs, or hang ups, unless you
think 1) hating terrorism, 2) loving free speech, 3) hating pedophiles, 4)
hating bigotry (including racism), 5) opposition to actual stalking, or 6)
anger at an attempt to put you in prison for a crime you didn’t commit, are based
on “hang ups.”
As for my
stubborn unwillingness to bend... let’s
just say that if you are born with a disability that makes you write four times
slower than most people when you print, twelve times slower when you attempt to
write in cursive... you learn how to persevere.*
Anyway, as for
the rest of the week, it is worth taking a time to set up events. Tomorrow, we will have a hearing in what I am
now referring to as K. Kimberlin v. Hoge,
where Brett is again trying to use his daughter to silence John (unlike
Brett, I do not do things that puts his daughter’s name in the press next
to his). And on the same day, I will
file... something to make the case go smoother.
Bluntly, dear reader, you should not expect something popcorn worthy at
all. I am likely to share that with you
Friday.
And at the same
time, Brett’s responses will start to be due.
So we will see what, if anything, he ends up filing.
So lots to
report on, dear reader. Just keep
stocking up on popcorn.
---------------------------------------
* Readers with
long memories might remember that the disability I am discussing, dysgraphia,
in my case does not affect my typing skills.
Which means I was born in almost
at the right time, but not quite there. Why
do I say that? Because laptop computers
were not a realistic option until after I dropped out of high school due to
disability discrimination, and after enrolled in college about four years later
than I probably would have, otherwise.
Once I had my first laptop computer, my long-dormant potential was
unlocked.
That last
sentence admittedly might sound arrogant, but to me it just is something I observed
in my lifetime. I mean, if Helen Keller told
you that she had felt like her potential was locked up until she was finally
able to learn to read and learn sign language by the teachings of Anne
Sullivan, you wouldn’t call that arrogant: you would call that simply an
accurate description of what happened.
What potential I had, was locked behind disabilities that severely
limited my ability to express myself in writing (my mouth, on the other hand,
always worked fine, to the chagrin of many).
But key to my
story, is that I didn’t have any of that until I was twenty two years old. The rest of my life, up until then, was spent
forcing myself to do something that required more determination than most
people have to exert. At my wedding, the
best man said I was the most stubborn person he ever knew, but I made that a
virtue. He said I would stubbornly stand
by wife no matter what, as I would my friends.
It has always been humbling to me to see how stubbornly they stood by
me, too.
As I jokingly
say, “John Adams said ‘facts are stubborn things.’ Well, so am I.”
---------------------------------------
My wife and I
have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist (and
adjudicated pedophile) Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed
and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years. I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you
read starting here,
you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video
evidence. If you would like to help in
the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on
the right. And thank you.
Follow me at
Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for
snark and site updates. And you can
purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A
Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.
And you can read a little more about my
novel, here.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused
some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even
criminal. In all cases, the only justice
I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice
system. I do not want to see vigilante
violence against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the
particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part
because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want
that to happen to him.
And for that
matter, don’t go on his property. Don’t
sneak around and try to photograph him.
Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision. Your behavior could quickly cross the line
into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not
contact his organizations, either. And
most of all, leave his family alone.
The only
exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course
nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any
stories you might report. And even then
if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request. That this is a key element in making out a
harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you
refuse.
And let me say
something else. In my heart of hearts, I
don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
How does he manage to keep filing lawsuits like this? Does this mean that there are still some Maryland judges that he has not managed to totally piss off?
ReplyDeleteMr. Walker, as a legal professional and having read many of your pleadings, you write very well. However, I would suggest one tiny change which will make the reading of your pleadings easier. Instead of writing "the plaintiff," just say, "plaintiff," leaving out "the." IMO legal pleadings read smoother that way.
ReplyDeleteVery much enjoy your blog and wish you and yours all good things.