This is the latest post in what I
half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®. If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not
everyone reads my blog. The short
version is that adjudicated
pedophile Brett Kimberlin has been harassing me for over two years, his
worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime. I recognize that this might sound like an
incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in
other words, you don’t have to believe my word.
You only have to believe your eyes.
And more recently when his wife came to us claiming that this convicted
terrorist had threatened her harm, we tried to help her leave him, and for
that, he is suing myself, John Hoge, Robert Stacy McCain and Ali Akbar for
helping his wife and he is suing Hoge, McCain, Akbar, DB Capital Strategies,
Michelle Malkin, Glenn Beck, James O’Keefe III, Patrick “Patterico” Frey, Mandy
Nagy, Lee Stranahan, Erick Erickson, Breitbart.com, the Blaze, Mercury Radio
Arts, Red State, the National Bloggers Club, and Simon and Shuster alleging that we are all in
organized crime for reporting factually about the spate of SWATtings committed
against myself, Frey and Erickson. So,
if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has
been happening.
 |
| I love the smell of popcorn in the morning... |
Yesterday I made
a trip to the Montgomery County Circuit Courthouse and picked up a new,
somewhat corrected copy of the transcript from last month’s trial of Kimberlin v. Walker et. al. That would be the case where Brett Kimberlin
accused me and my friends of falsely describing him as a pedophile and lost on
the issue of falsity. I won’t explain a
lot of how this new transcript came to be, just yet. For now, I will simply say that the original
was riddled with errors. Mind you, all
transcripts have errors, or at least things that people disagree on. But for instance, the original transcript had
my friend John Hoge apparently taking over our lawyer’s job for him when I was
on the stand. It was really bad and so
we got a new one.
I will update
this post, or write a new post, explaining what went on to bring this into
existance but for now it is worth noting the following about these new
transcripts:
1) They are now the official transcripts.
2) A great deal of personal information has been
redacted. We even redacted out the name
of the daughter, even as she testified on the stand. Her father doesn’t seem to care overly much
about the harm he is doing to his daughter in this, but I do. (And as usual, if you see something you think
we should have redacted, but didn’t, let me know.) Also, you will notice that the page jumps
from around 53 to 122 in the first transcript—that is an ugly deletion of the
entire jury selection process. Since we
had a directed verdict, literally all of that was irrelevant and I don’t want
to risk even a one in a thousand chance of an error.
