This is the latest post in what I
half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®. If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not
everyone reads my blog. The short
version is that convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin has been harassing me for
over three years, his worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a
crime. I recognize that this might sound
like an incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that
fact; in other words, you don’t have to believe my word. You only have to believe your eyes. Indeed, he sued me for saying this and lost
on the issue of truth. And more recently
when his wife came to us claiming that this convicted terrorist had threatened
her harm, we tried to help her leave him, and for that, he sued myself, John
Hoge, Robert Stacy McCain and Ali Akbar for helping his wife and he is suing
Hoge, McCain, Akbar, DB Capital Strategies, Michelle Malkin, Glenn Beck,
Patrick “Patterico” Frey, Mandy Nagy, Lee Stranahan, Erick Erickson,
Breitbart.com, the Blaze, Mercury Radio Arts, Red State, the National Bloggers
Club, and others alleging that we are
all in organized crime for reporting factually about the spate of SWATtings
committed against myself, Frey and Erickson.
So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has
been happening.
This is the
latest post in a continuing series that started here.
So yesterday,
I shared with you a redacted copy of Tetyana Kimberlin’s false charges and some
of my general thoughts about them. Now,
today as promised, I will share my motion to dismiss. Well, not the actual motion to dismiss
because the motion itself is just a “rump” motion to dismiss that says “please
dismiss this case because of the stuff I say in my memorandum of points and
authorities.” You can see an example of
this kind of motion, here. You literally gain nothing from reading that
so I am not even bothering to upload that.
So instead, what I have embedded is the Memorandum of Points and
Authorities, below the fold, which give you the actual argument for why the
case should be dismissed (with slight redactions of personal information):