The Brett Kimberlin Saga:

Follow this link to my BLOCKBUSTER STORY of how Brett Kimberlin, a convicted terrorist and perjurer, attempted to frame me for a crime, and then got me arrested for blogging when I exposed that misconduct to the world. That sounds like an incredible claim, but I provide primary documents and video evidence proving that he did this. And if you are moved by this story to provide a little help to myself and other victims of Mr. Kimberlin’s intimidation, such as Robert Stacy McCain, you can donate at the PayPal buttons on the right. And I thank everyone who has done so, and will do so.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

It’s Admirable to Call Women B*tches? A Fisking of Althouse

I generally like Ann Althouse, but I think she went really wrong with this one.

So yesterday there was a rumor that Jay-Z had decided to stop using the word “b*tch” in his music, prompted by the birth of his daughter.  This was based on a poem he allegedly wrote which said:

Before I got in the game, made a change, and got rich
I didn’t think hard about using the word bitch
I rapped, I flipped it, I sold it, I lived it
Now with my daughter in this world I curse those that give it

Which kind-of sort-of indicates that he was swearing it off, and that led to an editorial in the Guardian which led to commentary by Althouse.  And then a while later, Rolling Stone reports that the whole thing as false (leading Althouse to update the story).  Of course one might suspect that Jay-Z was floating a trial balloon and when his fans reacted negatively, he decided to pretend he never said it, but really I am not interested in whether this story is true or not.  I am interested in Althouse’s reaction to it, before the Rolling Stone article came along dispelling the rumor.  So leaving out the update where she mentions the Rolling Stone article, she writes:

Now that he has a baby girl, Jay-Z will eschew the word "bitch."

Is that enough?

Is it even admirable? If you do something only when you've acquired a self-interest, it seems to me it would be more admirable to continue doing what you were doing before.

Now, I am not personally opposed to all uses of the word “b*tch.”  If someone really deserves it, I call them either a b*tch or a b*stard, depending on gender.  But Guardian commenter Tricia Rose has a pretty valid point when she says:

It is quite true that hip-hop has played a starring role in making sexist ideas sexy, visible and funky. Through the power of black music, style, swagger and lyrical creativity, Jay-Z and many other highly successful rappers (e.g, Snoop Dog, 50 Cent and Lil' Wayne) have expanded the visibility and value of aggressively sexist lyrics. And, frankly, if you want to find openly celebrated sexism against black women, there is no richer contemporary source than commercial, mainstream hip-hop.

This hasn't happened because commercially powerful artists have randomly or dutifully dropped a sexist word here or there to punctuate an infectious beat. Whole identities in countless songs rely on excessively sexist behaviour and name-calling to define the protagonist's power and importance.

So let’s pretend that he really did decide to do this (even though he denied it later).  We still have Althouse stepping in and suggesting that he was doing this out of “self-interest.”

Well, now is that exactly right?  I mean he doesn’t personally benefit from this conduct—instead his daughter does.  So that is a dubious definition of self-interest.  I think there are lots of parents who consider themselves selfless when they give up something for their children.  But that is a forgivable error—it suggests that in Althouse’s mind she identifies so much with the good of her children that she considers their interests to be her “self-interest.”  But she is technically wrong.

The deeper error is that she discounted the possibility of a real change in heart.  It is hardly a new story to have a man witness the miracle of childbirth and for him to become a deeper person at that moment.  Some lessons in life, you can only learn by experience.

(Which apparently Jay-Z now is claiming he didn’t learn.  Again that returns me to the trial balloon theory—maybe he didn’t want to be that image anymore and was looking for a graceful way to leave it behind.)

And all of this is an example of how Ann Althouse is in many respects a leftist, although a moderate one.  It is fashionable chiefly on the left these days to pretend that the worst sin that a person could commit is to be a hypocrite.  So she thinks it is more admirable to be a consistent pig than to hypocritically stop being one out of the “self-interest” of having a daughter.  It’s a product of moral relativism which I dissected in an old post at Patterico’s.  As I wrote there:

Imagine if you asked Dr. [Martin Luther] King whose soul was more likely to be condemned by God.  Thomas Jefferson, a slave holder who hypocritically gave this nation a universal charter of freedom?  Or the slave holder who consistently maintained that slavery was right?  Thomas Jefferson couldn’t find the moral strength to stop owning slaves, but at least he made sure everyone understood that what he was doing was evil and it should not be followed.  Obviously the best option is for a person to be a consistent advocate of freedom..., but if that isn’t one of your choices, isn’t Jefferson’s hypocrisy preferable?

Likewise, I don’t think that Jay-Z should necessarily stop saying the word b*tch altogether, but if he could just stop being such a pig, and maybe even teach the impressionable young men who listen to him to show more respect for women, that’s a good thing, even if it is hypocritical.

------------------------

Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for snark and site updates.  And you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.  And you can read a little more about my novel, here.

3 comments:

  1. I don't think consistency is necessarily a virtue (and consistency isn't the opposite of hypocrisy anyway, BTW).

    And of course it is a good thing when someone becomes a deeper and more moral person.

    But... I'm largely with Althouse on this. Like the thief who suddenly becomes repentant of his crime after he is caught, it's the timing and circumstances of Jay-Z's conversion that's troubling.

    While I agree that...

    Some lessons in life, you can only learn by experience.

    ...this does not strike me as one of those times. I mean, if it takes having a daughter before a person finally realizes that, "gee, maybe 52% of the population ought not to be called a derogatory and demeaning word", then (in my book) that person is morally bankrupt to begin with. I know hundreds of men (myself included) who don't have a daughter and who find the use of the word "b*tch" to be misogynistic. We should pat Jay-Z on the back because he seems not to have figured it out until now? I think not.

    Jay-Z's conversion (which didn't "take", apparently) was out of self-interest -- his interest as a father as it relates to his (emphasize "his") daughter.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This reminds me of an interview with Pat Benatar that I read many years ago. It was after the birth of her daughter, and she said that she was trying to cut down on her swearing because she didn't want her daughter's first words to be, "Mama, you son of a bitch."

    ReplyDelete
  3. We are probably giving Mr Zee a little too much credit.

    But "If you do something only when you've acquired a self-interest, it seems to me it would be more admirable to continue doing what you were doing before."

    is really a good example of how Althouse thinks. Makes her blog really interesting even when I disagree with her. This stubborn 'be intellectually honest' thing.

    As Aaron notes:

    "It is fashionable chiefly on the left these days to pretend that the worst sin that a person could commit is to be a hypocrite."

    This is often just an ad hoc thing. These folks aren't nihilists, but they discounted a lot of attacks on 'their team' because they felt the policies were more important. then they wanted to support the attacks on 'the other team' because, hey, they don't really care for their policies anyway. So they found a very convenient way to do this because a lot of Republicans are Family Values promoters. Of course, a lot of Democrats are too, so this doesn't make any sense at all!


    Ken says:
    "if it takes having a daughter before a person finally realizes that, "gee, maybe 52% of the population ought not to be called a derogatory and demeaning word", then (in my book) that person is morally bankrupt to begin with."

    But I do want to permit morally bankrupt people to evolve. Yeah, if it takes having a daughter is what it took to respect women, that's pathetic (and I wonder if he really does respect women rather than his own ego as reflected in his child).

    As with so many sins and errors, it is much easier to come around after 'you've been caught'. That's just the way the world works. It's usually a good thing when it happens.

    ReplyDelete