This screencap says a great deal,
but not everything:
To review, Bill Schmalfeldt is facing
five criminal charges in Maryland filed by Lee Stranahan and John Hoge all
related to some kind of harassment. I have
seen the charges in both cases and this is not an attempt to stop Schmalfeldt
from talking about Lee or John. This is about Schmalfeldt’s repeated attempts
to contact these men, by email or other electronic means, even after both men
specifically told him to stop and other harassing conduct that is not protected by the First Amendment.
And I reported the other day when
things got more sinister. Bill
Schmalfeldt went on the radio and issued this threat to myself, John, Lee and
Patrick Frey:
And indeed he doubled down on the
threat in this clip:
He has since tried to have this
video and others yanked from YouTube on a bogus copyright claim, which I told
you about here. And indeed my latest video demonstrates just
how dishonest his copyright claim is:
Well, after the threat, Hoge
understandably had enough. Yesterday he
went to the District Court in Carroll County and filed for a peace order
against Schmalfeldt, requiring him to stay away from him, not to contact him and of course not to threaten him, among other things. It does not prevent Schmalfeldt from engaging in any constitutionally protected act of expression. I have spoken with
Hoge and he said it was particularly based on the “Ides of March” threat, and
the repeated harassing contacts Schmalfeldt has engaged in even after Hoge
filed criminal charges based on prior harassing contacts. John said that normally he would think that the "Ides of March" threat was just bloviating and would not take it seriously, but Schmalfeldt is
associated with dangerous people.
In other words, Hoge is not
trying to stop Schmalfeldt from speaking about
him to a general audience. He is
only seeking to prevent Schmalfeldt from contacting him or issuing threats
against him. You have a right to say to
someone “you may not contact me,” and you certainly have a right to say, “you
may not threaten me.” Hoge says “I am a firm
supporter of Schmalfeldt’s right to talk about me, but not to me or to threaten
others.”
Of course I have, by experience,
become something of an expert on the law of harassment and peace orders in
Maryland, and by the evidence I have seen, Schmalfeldt has at the very least harassed
Mr. Hoge and therefore Hoge is fully justified in filing for this peace order.
So the upshot is that right now a temporary peace order prevents Schmalfeldt from further harassing Hoge and next
Thursday there will be a hearing to determine if a final peace order should be issued. Schmalfeldt
has suggested on twitter that he won’t attend:
There will be a final peace order hearing on Feb. 28 at 10:30 AM at District Court in Westminster, MD, which I do not have to attend,
— Bill Schmalfeldt (@LiberalGrouch) February 22, 2013
...but that just means his peace order will be granted for six months.
— Bill Schmalfeldt (@LiberalGrouch) February 22, 2013
Could it be that he knows that
anything he says in the Peace Order hearing might be used against him in an
upcoming criminal trial?
Who knows? But interesting things are afoot.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused some people,
particularly Brett Kimberlin, of
reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even
criminal. In all cases, the only justice I want is through the
appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system. I do not want to see vigilante violence
against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the particular case of Brett
Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part because
under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to
happen to him.
And for that matter, don’t go on
his property. Don’t sneak around and try
to photograph him. Frankly try not to
even be within his field of vision. Your
behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to
mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not contact his
organizations, either. And most of all, leave his family alone.
The only exception to all that is
that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with
contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might
report. And even then if he tells you to
stop contacting him, obey that request. That
this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that
a person asks you to stop and you refuse.
And let me say something
else. In my heart of hearts, I don’t
believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
Those concerned might want to contact the local authorities (city and county) and let them know that a "swatting" at their homes may be in the planning stage for some time on or about March 15. There seems to be a pattern...
ReplyDeleteSo, what is the penalty in Maryland for violating a Peace Order? And for that, I mean if someone legitimately breaks one and the State's Attorney decides to prosecute (as opposed to the framejob BK pulled on you).
ReplyDeleteThanks, Aaron.
ReplyDeleteThe first one "Schmalfeldt gets threatening" was pulled due to his copyright claim.
ReplyDeleteAs ridiculous as their claims are, sometimes they actually WORK...!