[Update: Please note that I have removed the first name of Ms.
Kimberlin at her request and left only her first initial, “T.” She is, after
all, a victim of sexual abuse and those kinds of reasonable requests will be
honored. While the moral right to privacy
of rape victims is not absolute, it seems to be reasonably asserted here.]
The jovial figure I observed in
Mr. Elliott the week before was now subdued.
I mean how would you feel after watching
your girlfriend (meaning Brett Kimberlin’s wife) get arrested for bogus reasons?
Overall, Elliott seemed a little
overwhelmed by events. In all bluntness,
this guy needs a lawyer.
Judge Hamilton presided and
seemed to have difficulty communicating with Mr. Elliott. He wanted proof of communication from Brett
Kimberlin directed to Elliott himself and Elliott was unable for whatever
reasons to summon that. The petition was
ultimately denied although he could still re-file or appeal. There is a long history in this case of
District Courts getting it wrong, and Circuit Courts getting it right.
We also heard from T. Kimberlin, which brought out a few details.
Apparently my reading of her writing was wrong. She had been separated from Brett Kimberlin
for “around eight months” and she repeated the allegations that he was visiting
both of their places of employment and saying awful things about them, trying
to get them fired.
Brett Kimberlin, despite being
forbidden from testifying in Maryland, was able to present testimony of his
own. What he revealed is the creepy
depths he goes to when he is angry at someone, trying to smear their reputations. I won’t recount every vile thing he said
about Elliott and his wife, because I suspect he was hoping Mr. Hoge and I would
repeat it, but it will suffice that he made ugly, unsubstantiated and
ultimately irrelevant allegations about them both, the kinds which would be
familiar to anyone who has been watching how he has stalked myself, Lee
Stranahan, Stacy McCain, Ali Akbar and others over the last year. As he was defaming this man and the mother of
his children, the judge actually cut him off, saying, “I don’t care about that.” Once again, it was Brett Kimberlin who was attacking
his wife, not any of us and we will not give him the satisfaction of
publicizing his presumptively false accusations.
And while I won’t repeat every
vile accusation, of particular interest is his bizarre accusation that Elliott
was a Mormon who planned to make Ms. Kimberlin part of his polygamous harem
(because he is apparently unaware that the Mormons swore off polygamy decades
ago). I have no idea whether Elliott is
a Mormon... or did Kimberlin think he could make all these accusations because
he has ties to Utah? In any case, I don’t
mind repeating the allegation because it is so idiotic it makes Kimberlin look
bad. And it is certainly rich that after
he attacked me for criticizing Islam that he would attack Mormonism on those
terms. I mean isn’t Islam a polygamous
religion (though I don’t know any American Muslims who practice polygamy)?
He also had the nerve to call
Elliott a “predator.” This from a guy who once
called a ten year old girl his “girlfriend.” But this is typical of Brett Kimberlin:
accuse the accusers of doing what you actually did. By all evidence, Mr. Elliott is just a guy
who fell in love with woman who was trapped in bad marriage.
So what starts to emerge from
their testimony is this. Brett and
T. separated for whatever reason around November of last year. So, contrary to Brett Kimberlin’s story
before the court last week, she didn’t run away from him on June 20. She was already living her own life. But she chose to go on a vacation and when Brett
Kimberlin found out it was with Mr. Elliott he went into a rage. Brett Kimberlin might have believed he was
taking her to the evil Mormons, or that might be a stupid lie he told in court
to make his actions seem (in his mind) more reasonable. In all this time she had evidently been
allowed to use the Toyota Highlander Brett claims is owned by one of his charities. So he decides to try to control his wife,
again, by claiming her right to use the car was revoked and threatening
criminal charges if they didn’t interrupt their vacation and return it.
And Brett Kimberlin is naturally
upset at Mr. Hoge and I because he hoped to use the apparatus of the state to abuse
these people without anyone noticing.
Well, the world is taking notice.
Anyway, as you might suspect from
the forgoing, Kimberlin won this round, but we will see if Mr. Elliot and Ms.
Kimberlin end up getting the help they deserve.
And finally as a coda. Do you remember the salacious text messages
that Kimberlin claimed Elliott sent him last week? You know, described sex acts between Mr. Elliott
and Ms. Kimberlin and Brett Kimberlin read in front of his nine year old
daughter?
Elliott didn’t even send
them. So Brett Kimberlin exposed his
daughters to words like “sucking his dick” and “fucking your wife” and the guy
didn’t even say those things. What does
that say about Brett Kimberlin’s character that he would do that?
And one more thing. Mr. Elliott evidently is commenting on Hoge’s
post on today’s proceedings. So you
might want to check it out.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused some people,
particularly Brett Kimberlin, of
reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even
criminal. In all cases, the only justice I want is through the
appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system. I do not want to see vigilante violence
against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the particular case of Brett
Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part
because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want
that to happen to him.
And for that matter, don’t go on
his property. Don’t sneak around and try
to photograph him. Frankly try not to
even be within his field of vision. Your
behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to
mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not contact his organizations,
either. And most of all, leave his family alone.
The only exception to all that is
that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with
contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might
report. And even then if he tells you to
stop contacting him, obey that request. That
this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that
a person asks you to stop and you refuse.
And let me say something
else. In my heart of hearts, I don’t
believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
Sorry that you had to deal with this guy and that you and your family suffered for it. His behavior is unacceptable.
ReplyDeleteBK has contact JE's employer, the corporate office/counsel and the franchisee, with the same salacious allegations. JE needs to lawyer up, contact his employer and be very, very careful.
ReplyDeleteIs BK's loan of the tax exempt organization's car to his wife for purely personal reasons a violation of the tax regulations?
ReplyDelete