The Brett Kimberlin Saga:

Follow this link to my BLOCKBUSTER STORY of how Brett Kimberlin, a convicted terrorist and perjurer, attempted to frame me for a crime, and then got me arrested for blogging when I exposed that misconduct to the world. That sounds like an incredible claim, but I provide primary documents and video evidence proving that he did this. And if you are moved by this story to provide a little help to myself and other victims of Mr. Kimberlin’s intimidation, such as Robert Stacy McCain, you can donate at the PayPal buttons on the right. And I thank everyone who has done so, and will do so.

Thursday, February 27, 2014

DB Capital Strategies Reply to Convicted Terrorist Brett Kimberlin

This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®.  If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not everyone reads my blog.  The short version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over two years, his worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime.   I recognize that this might sound like an incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in other words, you don’t have to believe my word.  You only have to believe your eyes.  So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.

So the dribbling of documents continues.  Admittedly this is not the most exciting document.  That isn’t to say it isn’t good for what it is trying to accomplish.  It is quite excellent in several ways, including a better development of my arguments that 1) the declaration is improper, and 2) Kimberlin improperly added new allegations.  The problem that weighs it down looking at it, now, is that we know it is probably going to be mooted when Brett files his amended complaint.

Still for what it is worth, you can read it below the fold:

One thing of note is that my reply to Brett’s opposition to my motion to strike did borrow from Backer’s filing, specifically using the McGuire case (and yes, that involves Mark McGuire), which is an ongoing, and indeed mutual, phenomenon.  There is an attachment but it is just a table of new facts alleged.  You might remember I did something like that in the Motion to Strike.

So that is it until Monday and there are a few documents more to dribble out.  I think the highlight of the remaining documents is the Levy affidavit, which contains an interesting nugget.  And maybe there is something else I will be able to share, by then.


My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years.  I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video evidence.  If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on the right.  And thank you.

Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for snark and site updates.  And you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.  And you can read a little more about my novel, here.



I have accused some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct.  In some cases, the conduct is even criminal.  In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system.  I do not want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such violence.  This kind of conduct is not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.

In the particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him.  Do not call him.  Do not write him a letter.  Do not write him an email.  Do not text-message him.  Do not engage in any kind of directed communication.  I say this in part because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.

And for that matter, don’t go on his property.  Don’t sneak around and try to photograph him.  Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision.  Your behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).

And do not contact his organizations, either.  And most of all, leave his family alone.

The only exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might report.  And even then if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request.  That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.

And let me say something else.  In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above.  But if any of you have, stop it, and if you haven’t don’t start.


  1. If and when Kimberlin files a Second Amended Complaint and elects to comply with Local Rule 103.6 which the Judge ordered for acceptance of the filing, he will have to file a marked copy of the SAC indicating changes. That marked copy will show the inherent bad faith in his initial filings and the substantial extent he has modified his pleadings in reaction to the motions of the defendants. It will look like an exercise Aaron completed in one of his earlier filings and an entirely new complaint bootstrapped from the motions of defendants.

    I'm not sure how the Judge reacts to that. The defendants told the Judge Kimby had nothing and moved to dismiss based on that. Does the Judge now allow a SAC which proves Kimby had nothing, which was fully briefed for dismissal, now to be fundamentally altered into an entirely new set of unbriefed claims at substantial time and cost to the court and defendants?

    All I know is I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

  2. In re McGuire, 450 B.R. 68, involves somebody named Mark McGuire, but I don't think it's a famous person. The guy who hit 583 home runs and later admitted to steroid use is Mark McGwire, spelled with a "w".

  3. Thanks for posting this. It will be interesting to see if the court dismisses these cases based on the weakness of the plaintiff's pleadings.