This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®. If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not
everyone reads my blog. The short
version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over two years, his worst
conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime. I recognize that this might sound like an
incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in
other words, you don’t have to believe my word.
You only have to believe your eyes.
So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.
In the last
two entries I have been sharing documents from the federal case. This time I am going to share something with
you from the state case. You see, Brett
is trying to shut us up, again, based
on the same busted claims he tried to use last year. Read below the fold:
Oy, there is
so much wrong here, it makes my head hurt and at the request of my lawyer I
will keep the analysis to a minimum. I
will note that I have excluded many of his exhibits. They are basically the same exhibits he threw
into his Opposition
to the Franklin Center’s Motion to Dismiss.
I mean I didn’t check each one to make sure it is a 1 to 1 correlation,
but it is very close and frankly it just doesn’t make sense to include them
given the effort involved.
Also you have
to love the lameness of the claim that by telling you not to stalk and harass
him, I am supposedly telling people to
stalk and harass, by some reverse psychology voodoo jedi mind trick. Of course in saying that he is once again forgetting
Brandenburg
v. Ohio, which sets the standard for incitement. As the Supreme Court said there:
[T]he
constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State
to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except
where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless
action and is likely to incite or produce such action.
So what I have
written doesn’t even fit the first part of that test. I have not advocated the use of force or “law
violation” let alone trying to cause imminent lawlessness under circumstances
where it is likely to occur (and imminently means pretty close to
immediately—it is riling up the crowd and sending them down the street with
torches to attack some people).
Seriously, this guy has been whining that any day now someone is going
to kill him for over a year and yet he is still alive and unharmed. He hasn’t even had a close scrape.
And no, voodoo
reverse psychology doesn’t count.
Sheesh.
In any case,
he should have figured out by now, that I am not going to bow to his
lawfare. I am going to continue to peacefully
write the truth about him and all his fascist attempts to silence me and others
will come to naught.
---------------------------------------
My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted
terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame
me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years. I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you
read starting here,
you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video
evidence. If you would like to help in
the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on
the right. And thank you.
Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing,
mostly for snark and site updates. And
you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel:
A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.
And you can read a little more about my
novel, here.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused
some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even
criminal. In all cases, the only justice
I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice
system. I do not want to see vigilante
violence against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the
particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part because
under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to
happen to him.
And for that
matter, don’t go on his property. Don’t
sneak around and try to photograph him.
Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision. Your behavior could quickly cross the line
into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not
contact his organizations, either. And
most of all, leave his family alone.
The only
exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course
nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any
stories you might report. And even then
if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request. That this is a key element in making out a
harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you
refuse.
And let me say
something else. In my heart of hearts, I
don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
No comments:
Post a Comment