BREAKING: Blowback for Convicted and Admitted Document Forger Brett Kimberlin in the RICO Suit?

This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga^®.  If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not everyone reads my blog.  The short version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over two years, his worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime.   I recognize that this might sound like an incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in other words, you don’t have to believe my word.  You only have to believe your eyes.  And more recently when his wife came to us claiming that this convicted terrorist had threatened her harm, we tried to help her leave her, and for that, he is suing myself, John Hoge, Robert Stacy McCain and Ali Akbar for helping his wife and he is suing Hoge, McCain, Akbar, DB Capital Strategies, Michelle Malkin, Glenn Beck, James O’Keefe III, Patrick “Patterico” Frey, Mandy Nagy, Lee Stranahan, Erick Erickson, Breitbart.com, the Blaze, Mercury Radio Arts, Red State, the National Bloggers Club, and  Simon and Shuster alleging that we are all in organized crime for reporting factually about the spate of SWATtings committed against myself, Frey and Erickson.  So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.

Well, at this point it is only a possibility but just today Michael Smith, attorney for Michelle Malkin and Twitchy filed this letter with the court below the fold:

   ECF 120 Ltr Requesting Leave to File Supp Mem and TR by AaronWorthing

As you may remember, we have a pending motion for sanctions and a motion to dismiss based on Brett forging a summons for Twitchy, something which he admitted to doing but claimed it was just an honest mistake.  And you may also remember that last week Brett admitted in court to a second forgery.  I reported on that here, and made my own attempt at a transcription, here.  John has just gotten the official transcription, here.  As I always say, I am not a court reporter, so unless what is transcribed is wildly different from reality I will defer to that transcription.

Anyway, so besides the request, it gives the judge notice that Brett has said more on the matter and what he said suggests that there is a pattern of forgeries.  You know, from the convicted document forger whose behavior resulted in this ridiculousness:

[FBI Agent] Lucas had been called to a printing establishment. He observed defendant [Kimberlin] wearing clothing with badges and insignia. The insignia was identical to that of the Security Police of the Defense Department. Defendant had in hand a facsimile of the Presidential Seal and other documents, one or more of which he attempted to chew up.

Source.  As we often joke, Brett is one of the few people on earth who knows what Presidential Seal tastes like.  So even if the request is denied, the judge knows in the back of his mind that there is more out there.  And presumably if the request is granted, the court is going to be treated to not only Brett admitting to another forgery—this time not claiming it was a mistake but supposedly a true representation of what he told the post office to do (but oddly they didn't do it and he didn't pay them to do it)—but he also gets this exchange from the judge:

BK: You know, like I said I am a pro-se litigant and --

J: [audible scoff] Don’t even use that with me.

BK: Okay, Okay --

J: You know, it’s one thing to say I am pro se so I don’t understand rules or I don’t understand how to get something in and the rules of evidence and another thing to alter something and file it.

(That is a merger of my transcription and the official transcript.)  Brett was trying the “I’m just an ignorant pro se” routine when he admitted to forging a summons and here he is being smacked down for trying it there.  Of course several lawyers in the RICO suit have made the same argument that Judge Ryon made but...  we aren’t judges, see?  So it carries a little extra weight when she says it.

Ah, if only the official transcript included her scoff!

It really raises the question of whether this was the only game Brett was playing: trying desperately to get a default judgment so then from then on he can claim to the whole world that he sued us for saying he was involved in SWATting and got a judgment.  That is certainly how he has tried to use the Seth Allen verdict which...

…come to think of it, didn’t Allen say that the default was obtained by fraudulent service?

Well, we shall see how it all develops.  But always remain a happy warrior, folks.

---------------------------------------

My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years.  I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video evidence.  If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on the right.  And thank you.

Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for snark and site updates.  And you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.  And you can read a little more about my novel, here.

---------------------------------------

Disclaimer:

I have accused some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct.  In some cases, the conduct is even criminal.  In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system.  I do not want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such violence.  This kind of conduct is not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.

In the particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him.  Do not call him.  Do not write him a letter.  Do not write him an email.  Do not text-message him.  Do not engage in any kind of directed communication.  I say this in part because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.

And for that matter, don’t go on his property.  Don’t sneak around and try to photograph him.  Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision.  Your behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).

And do not contact his organizations, either.  And most of all, leave his family alone.

The only exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might report.  And even then if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request.  That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.

And let me say something else.  In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above.  But if any of you have, stop it, and if you haven’t don’t start.