This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®. If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not everyone reads my blog. The short version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over two years, his worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime. I recognize that this might sound like an incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in other words, you don’t have to believe my word. You only have to believe your eyes. So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.
So as you might have seen over at Hogewash or the Other McCain, Brett Kimberlin had a terrible no good very bad day in court today. On the docket were three motions for sanctions. The first two were Brett’s. One was against Patrick Ostronic claiming that Akbar is not a Virginia resident (and as I understand it, Ali isn’t a resident of the Commonwealth). The second was against me for filing a motion in as another party in support of Kimberlin Unmasked. Both of those were so frivolous that Brett voluntarily withdrew them at the beginning of the hearing.
This was not the case for our attorney, Patrick Ostronic, Esq. seeking sanctions for the alteration of a certified mail green card. To see an example of the crushing evidence against Brett on this point, go here. Namely he keeps adding a checkmark to the green card indicating restricted delivery, after it had been sent and returned without that option chosen. This is important because under Maryland law, the initial service has to be restricted delivery—that is, they want to make extra sure you actually know about the suit before they can do things like find you in default judgment if you don’t respond.
Judge Joan Ryan presided. Brett showed up looking entirely too casual, with hair that had overgrown into an ugly mullet, a suit but no tie, and loafers with white socks. Also he wore a Yale jacket as an overcoat when he came in, probably as a way of irritating me since I actually graduated from their law school, or something.
And so Judge Ryon drilled down into the central question: did you alter this green card? I plan to listen to the audio again tonight and report in more detail when I do, but going by notes plus memory he first denied that any document was altered. Then he backed off a little and said he didn’t change them “intentionally.” The judge finally backed him into a corner and asked him if he changed it at all and he admitted he did.
Brett then started doing his “I’m just an ignorant pro se” routine. He had done it before in the hearing and got shot down but this time the judge lost her temper, saying, “don’t even use that with me.” She went on to say, in paraphrase, that this isn’t a case of Brett getting confused about procedure, but he actively presented false evidence to this court. It was the same point we have been making in the federal court: you don’t need to go to law school to know you aren’t supposed to do this.
Brett’s excuse was novel. You see according to him he had told the post office they were supposed to have restricted delivery and when he saw the checkmark wasn’t made, well, he just fixed it. After it was mailed and came back, that is. To reflect what he wanted them to do.
Yes, that is a sarcastic description of what he argued, but there you go. So for those keeping track, first in the Federal case he just assumed that the clerk made a mistake and didn’t give him the summons. And then I guess he assumed the post office made a mistake?
Which is load of manure. He is just such a compulsive criminal that he didn’t even want to bother to spend the money. Yes, it’s a couple bucks, but how is that out of character for him? How is it different, for instance, than him claiming ludicrously that he didn’t know he was called The Speedway Bomber? He is not only a serious criminal but he is also engaged in constant, petty criminality.
So after the judge had decided that he had done this—either before or after the hearing she referred to it as a “fraud on the court”—she had to decide on punishment. Mr. Ostronic was pushing for the case to be dismissed at least for Ali Akbar. Unfortunately, she was not willing to do that because she felt that the issue of service was no longer “live.” So she literally said that she wanted to fine Brett but wasn’t sure if she had the statutory authority. So she called a recess of about ten minutes as she went back to check on the legal issue and unfortunately when she came back she said that she did not. So instead she read him the riot act.
“Oh!” you might say, “so he gets away with it!” Yes, you can look at it that way, but now we have a record of his misconduct we can take to the federal court where they are contemplating sanctions against him. And yes, in Federal Court they can definitely sanction him not only with dismissal (cross fingers) but with monetary fines. Sometimes it takes several bricks to build a wall.
So a bad day in court for Brett where he is lucky that he didn’t leave the court with a fine. A convicted document forger has admitted to forging a summons and now altering a green card. Does anyone else think that it is credible that he has reformed?
My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years. I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video evidence. If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on the right. And thank you.
Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for snark and site updates. And you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here. And you can read a little more about my novel, here.
I have accused some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even criminal. In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system. I do not want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed communication. I say this in part because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.
And for that matter, don’t go on his property. Don’t sneak around and try to photograph him. Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision. Your behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not contact his organizations, either. And most of all, leave his family alone.
The only exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might report. And even then if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request. That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.
And let me say something else. In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you haven’t don’t start.
I think the "hapless pro se" fashion was carefully chosen.ReplyDelete
He is not only a serious criminal but he is also engaged in constant, petty criminality.ReplyDelete
I want to say he is both a serious criminal, and at the same time also a ... petty ... criminal.
A convicted document forger has admitted to forging a summons and now altering a green card. Does anyone else think that it is credible that he has reformed?
That's a good question. It depends: can he get partial credit for not bombing people?
Have you contacted the USPS and Federal prosecutors? Or whoever is in charge of dealing with unsupervised parolees?ReplyDelete
He literally admitted in court to committing a crime. That should be relevant to someone.
Sadly, it appears that that is so only if your activities go against the people in positions of power. If you are someone who has performed deeds for the elites, no so much.Delete