Searches... We Have Searches

One small feature that blogger includes is the ability to see where you are getting your referrals.  It’s a good way to figure out where my hits are coming from and to thank people for linking to me.  It doesn’t work perfectly 100% of the time, but it works pretty darn well.

It also tells me what google searches have led them to my site.  Mind you it doesn’t tell me who reached my site with that search, only that someone did.  And sometimes that can be interesting.  As of this minute, this is what I am getting.  First we have:

Allergic to Bull

Well, that makes sense.  It is, after all, the name of the blog.  Next up:

Andrew Breitbart

Another perfectly logical search.  I just wrote a piece on what I called the malicious lawsuit of Shirley Sherrod, so it only makes sense.  Next up:

Case law great bodily injury.

Ah, cool!  This means someone was probably researching the legal question of what constitutes great bodily injury and my analysis of how “great bodily harm” applies to the Zimmerman case probably helped them out.  Good joss!  Next up:

Hustler article Falwell

And that makes sense, too.  I talk a lot about the famous Hutler magazine v. Falwell litigation as a seminal case regarding First Amendment issues.  And everyone knows I loves me some free speech.  Next up:

Jay Richard Elliot

Well, that would be the boyfriend of Ms. Kimberlin whom I revealed recently that Brett Kimberlin called a “f—king black n-gger.”  You know, only without the censorship.  And let’s remember that this racist terrorist is suing us and please donate to the cause.  Next up:

Michael Savage is an idiot

Heh, that probably brought them to my post pointing out Savage’s idiotic analysis of the Zimmerman case.  Cool.  And it is nice to see even stuff I wrote months ago having an influence.  And what is the next search term…?

My wife and her bull f---ing

Only not censored, like I did.

Words fail me.  It’s a sick internet out there, folks.  Lock up the kiddies.

---------------------------------------

Disclaimer:

I have accused some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct.  In some cases, the conduct is even criminal.  In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system.  I do not want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such violence.  This kind of conduct is not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.

In the particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him.  Do not call him.  Do not write him a letter.  Do not write him an email.  Do not text-message him.  Do not engage in any kind of directed communication.  I say this in part because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.

And for that matter, don’t go on his property.  Don’t sneak around and try to photograph him.  Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision.  Your behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).

And do not contact his organizations, either.  And most of all, leave his family alone.

The only exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might report.  And even then if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request.  That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.

And let me say something else.  In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above.  But if any of you have, stop it, and if you haven’t don’t start.