The Brett Kimberlin Saga:

Follow this link to my BLOCKBUSTER STORY of how Brett Kimberlin, a convicted terrorist and perjurer, attempted to frame me for a crime, and then got me arrested for blogging when I exposed that misconduct to the world. That sounds like an incredible claim, but I provide primary documents and video evidence proving that he did this. And if you are moved by this story to provide a little help to myself and other victims of Mr. Kimberlin’s intimidation, such as Robert Stacy McCain, you can donate at the PayPal buttons on the right. And I thank everyone who has done so, and will do so.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

The Most Ridiculous Line In Brett Kimberlin’s Lawsuits

This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®.  If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not everyone reads my blog.  The short version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over a year, his worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime.   I recognize that this might sound like an incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in other words, you don’t have to believe my word.  You only have to believe your eyes.  So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.

Update: I have waaay too much fun with this on twitter.  See below.

So yesterday I dropped on your five different documents in the two lawsuits filed by Brett Kimberin and myself.  You can read my basic motion to dismiss, here; the memorandum of points and authorities for that motion, here; a motion requiring him to file verified pleadings, here; and a memorandum in support of maintaining Kimberlin Unmasked’s identity, here.  And I posted a copy of DB Capital Strategies’ motion to dismiss, here.

And for the most part, I let the documents speak for themselves.  But there is one line that in Brett Kimberlin’s complaints that is so lame it deserves highlighting.  And folks, I am not sure you are going to believe he wrote it unless you read see the scan for yourself:

You can't make this stuff up, folks.That is from paragraph 181 of his First Amended Complaint in the RICO case.  You catch that?  Let me emphasize what he is saying: he is saying because of our alleged defamation we have made “Plaintiff appear odious, infamous, and/or frightening.”

We did that, according to him.  As though this was not a bit odious:

Kimberlin was convicted as the so-called "Speedway Bomber," who terrorized the city of Speedway, Indiana, by detonating a series of explosives in early September 1978. In the worst incident, Kimberlin placed one of his bombs in a gym bag, and left it in a parking lot outside Speedway High School. Carl Delong was leaving the high school football game with his wife when he attempted to pick up the bag and it exploded. The blast tore off his lower right leg and two fingers, and embedded bomb fragments in his wife's leg. He was hospitalized for six weeks, during which he was forced to undergo nine operations to complete the amputation of his leg, reattach two fingers, repair damage to his inner ear, and remove bomb fragments from his stomach, chest, and arm. In February 1983, he committed suicide.

As though having committed crimes serious enough to earn you a nickname didn’t make him infamous.

As though having cost a man his life and setting off bombs for nearly a whole week didn’t make him frightening.

He is claiming that but for our supposedly defamatory statements and psychic implications, people would have seen him as... lovable, unknown, and unalarming.

And even more ridiculous than that, he doesn’t just say this in the federal case.  He repeats that that word-for-word in paragraph 70 of his First Amended Complaint in the Maryland state case, too.  So one group of defendants in the RICO case allegedly made him seem “odious, infamous and/or frightening,” and then... I guess his theory is people forgot about how odious, infamous and/or frightening in a few months and so the second set of defendants made him odious, infamous and/or frightening all over again.  Gee, and he was so close to being able to have slumber parties in his mother’s basement, too.

I mean, let me draw it out as a metaphor.  Let us say tomorrow a man finds the grave of Nathan Bedford Forrest, first head of the KKK, digs up his body and stabs it in the chest.  And then some other guy goes up to it and stabs it a few times, too.  I mean we are talking a worm-ridden corpse was these two guys are stabbing it.

So the police arrive and they arrest these two men.  Can the police charge these two men with murder?

Of course not.  You know, because it is legally impossible to murder what is already dead.  That might be some kind of grave desecration offense, but it ain’t murder.

So how exactly do you “murder” a reputation that committed suicide when I was in Elementary school?  And how do you do it twice?

Exit question: is Brett just telling another of his brazen lies?  Or does he really believe that everyone would think he was a swell guy if only these evil people hadn’t allegedly stated and implied he was involved in SWATting me, Patrick Frey and Erick Erickson and that he is a pedophile?  Is he deluded about his reputation and his ability to keep a lid on it, or is he just deluded into believing he wouldn’t be called on this bit of bull?

Update: Here’s the fun I had on twitter:

And others got in on the fun:

Heh, indeed.


* And of course I am glossing over the many, many other ways that Brett’s reputation has been ruined by people he is not suing today.  And very often these have been self-inflicted wounds.


My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years.  I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video evidence.  If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on the right.  And thank you.

Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for snark and site updates.  And you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.  And you can read a little more about my novel, here.



I have accused some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct.  In some cases, the conduct is even criminal.  In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system.  I do not want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such violence.  This kind of conduct is not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.

In the particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him.  Do not call him.  Do not write him a letter.  Do not write him an email.  Do not text-message him.  Do not engage in any kind of directed communication.  I say this in part because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.

And for that matter, don’t go on his property.  Don’t sneak around and try to photograph him.  Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision.  Your behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).

And do not contact his organizations, either.  And most of all, leave his family alone.

The only exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might report.  And even then if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request.  That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.

And let me say something else.  In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above.  But if any of you have, stop it, and if you haven’t don’t start.


  1. I'm sure Brett's claims regarding Dan Quayle had no impact on his notoriety.

  2. The progress of this saga is beginning to make me feel all warm and fuzzy. Seeing finally that the "Maryland Midget" get slapped is delicious.

    A note for the webmaster, sir. I can not see what I assume are Twitter screen shots. I use a simple HOST file to filter out ick in general, and MVPS Host File must be filtering what is not visable to me. I can only assume that the web master is using some image hosting server that has landed on a black list. I do use Twitter, but I would love to see yours above. If I have got this right, MVPS list can be found here:

    Thank you for your consideration.

  3. Well, you may have presented reasons to find him odious, infamous, and frightening, but I'd say that is a rational reaction to what he did. Why shouldn't we view bombers and perjurers that way?