The Brett Kimberlin Saga:

Follow this link to my BLOCKBUSTER STORY of how Brett Kimberlin, a convicted terrorist and perjurer, attempted to frame me for a crime, and then got me arrested for blogging when I exposed that misconduct to the world. That sounds like an incredible claim, but I provide primary documents and video evidence proving that he did this. And if you are moved by this story to provide a little help to myself and other victims of Mr. Kimberlin’s intimidation, such as Robert Stacy McCain, you can donate at the PayPal buttons on the right. And I thank everyone who has done so, and will do so.

Thursday, February 6, 2014

Convicted Document-Forger Brett Kimberlin’s Fraud on the Court

This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®.  If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not everyone reads my blog.  The short version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over a year, his worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime.   I recognize that this might sound like an incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in other words, you don’t have to believe my word.  You only have to believe your eyes.  So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.

Well, dear reader, in the last post I said that I wasn’t going to blog until I got a little more under my belt in terms of the RICO case, and so we have some catching up to do.  This will be the first in a series where I present to you various filings that have occurred in this case, in this case by Michelle Malkin and the non-party Twitchy.

And I can almost hear you, dear reader.  “Wait a minute,” you might say, “I thought Twitchy was being sued, too?  Since when are they a ‘non-party.’”  Well, I will let the able Mr. Smith explain it to you, below the fold in his memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss:

Of course if you find it hard to believe that Brett Kimberlin would do something as outrageous as forging a summons, and crudely at that, well, consider this passage from one of many cases he was involved in, talking about the time he was caught red handed with forged documents:

[FBI Agent] Lucas had been called to a printing establishment. He observed defendant wearing clothing with badges and insignia. The insignia was identical to that of the Security Police of the Defense Department. Defendant had in hand a facsimile of the Presidential Seal and other documents, one or more of which he attempted to chew up.

Read the whole thing, if you are inclined.  For those keeping close track, this is the third time he has been caught falsifying documents in relation to his recent litigation.  First he was busted for falsifying service to Ali Akbar in the state case, then he was busted by Mr. Hoge in the federal case for claiming to have sent a package, certified mail, for only $1.25.  And now this.

Mr. Smith alludes to this potentially being mail fraud, but the problem might go much deeper than that.  This was a mailing that starting Maryland, was sent to California, with the ultimate destination being Colorado.  Depending on what those different state laws say, he might be facing forgery and attempted fraud charges in three different jurisdictions, as well as federal charges.  And really, in a case where you charge others with mail fraud, is it smart to actually commit it yourself?

Then again, is “smart” the word you would use for most of Brett’s life decisions?

In the interest of fairness, meanwhile, let me show you the sum total of what he has filed in response to these serious accusations.

So basically he doesn’t deny the allegation that he attempted a fraud upon this court, he just pretended they were parties all along.  Perhaps when he files an opposition to their motion to dismiss he will say more.  Perhaps like with Hoge’s motions pointing out his malfeasance he will simply play dumb.  Only time will tell.

This is in essence a motion for leave to amend, and Twitchy will have the right to oppose it.  And there are legal standards which govern whether one should be granted.  What are those standards, you might ask?  Well, hold on and you will see over the next few days.

So that’s it for today.  Mr. Smith filed other forms such as a notice of appearance, and a pro-forma motion to dismiss that basically said “for all the reasons in the memo, dismiss this thing.”  The only other thing we saw of interest is that Mr. Smith is requesting a hearing.  We’ll see if that motion is granted.  It is likely to be an evidentiary hearing and thus Brett will be likely to testify.  Dear reader, do you think he might perjure himself in that context?  Ah, perish the thought!

Anyway, I think tomorrow I will share with you the Franklin Center’s Reply to Brett’s silly response to them.  Tune in!


My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years.  I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video evidence.  If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on the right.  And thank you.

Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for snark and site updates.  And you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.  And you can read a little more about my novel, here.



I have accused some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct.  In some cases, the conduct is even criminal.  In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system.  I do not want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such violence.  This kind of conduct is not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.

In the particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him.  Do not call him.  Do not write him a letter.  Do not write him an email.  Do not text-message him.  Do not engage in any kind of directed communication.  I say this in part because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.

And for that matter, don’t go on his property.  Don’t sneak around and try to photograph him.  Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision.  Your behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).

And do not contact his organizations, either.  And most of all, leave his family alone.

The only exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might report.  And even then if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request.  That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.

And let me say something else.  In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above.  But if any of you have, stop it, and if you haven’t don’t start.


  1. I am, of course, just speculating here, but what this seems like to me is that he is basically playing a game. I mean literally. To him this is like a very intense game of chess or video game. His interest in this seems like someone who is greatly interested in a hobby. It seems he is devoting a lot of time and thought to these various things he does. He is possibly spending a lot more time in cooking this stuff up than the others in the game are spending paying attention to it. I also noticed the same behavior pattern from an associate of his. This is very much like they are creating a real world sort of "dungeons and dragons" but using the legal system for their gaming field. It is just all so weird.

  2. I am not sure what Kimberlin is doing, and he may not be sure either. He is playing fast and loose with the courts. And he may well have already crossed several lines he didn't intentionally cross including fraud, forgery and other malfeasance. This suit may well be his undoing or at least a major problem...

  3. "he is one of the few living Americans incapable of having his reputation damaged beyond the level to which he himself already has lowered it. He is libel-proof."

    pure. gold.