The Brett Kimberlin Saga:

Follow this link to my BLOCKBUSTER STORY of how Brett Kimberlin, a convicted terrorist and perjurer, attempted to frame me for a crime, and then got me arrested for blogging when I exposed that misconduct to the world. That sounds like an incredible claim, but I provide primary documents and video evidence proving that he did this. And if you are moved by this story to provide a little help to myself and other victims of Mr. Kimberlin’s intimidation, such as Robert Stacy McCain, you can donate at the PayPal buttons on the right. And I thank everyone who has done so, and will do so.

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

BREAKING: Convicted Perjurer and Document Forger Brett Kimberlin Denied Motion to Extend (Update: Order Shown)

This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®.  If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not everyone reads my blog.  The short version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over two years, his worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime.   I recognize that this might sound like an incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in other words, you don’t have to believe my word.  You only have to believe your eyes.  So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.

Well, the hits just keep coming, don’t they?  As I said this morning, Brett’s motion for an extension of time to reply to Levy’s fairly devastating opposition to his motion for discovery of Ace’s identity was still outstanding.  Well, now it no longer is outstand: Brett  lost that motion.

In that post I imagined three different scenarios.  I am somewhat surprised to get a fourth possible outcome: a very restrained short order denying the motion.  I figured if the judge was likely to deny it that he would do so based on the fact Brett didn’t seek leave first.  Instead, he considered it “on the merits” and found that there were no merits.  I mean that literally.  From the order:

I note that the motion relies on Plaintiff’s filing of a motion to disqualify counsel, which has been stricken and returned as improperly filed under my Letter Order of February 21, 2014, ECF No. 88.  Accordingly, I find that there is no basis for an extension[.]

This lines up with what I said this morning, specifically that:

the original grounds of the extension—“I need an extension while this court considers the awesomeness of my motion to disqualify”—has had its feet cut out from under it by the fact that the motion to disqualify is no longer on the table.  And the logic of returning the motion to disqualify suggests that the motion for an extension should equally be dismissed out of hand.

It is strange for the judge to issue an order, rather than just send back the document like what happened with the motion to disqualify but the upshot is the same: Brett needs to respond to Ace’s Opposition, or leave their claims unanswered (and they were pretty devastating, including pointing out that Brett’s enemies tend to be SWATted and that he is defamation-proof).

This is also a further sign that the judge is getting sick of the case.  I frankly expected the judge to give Brett a “mulligan” and give him an extra day or two.  I am therefore surprised that the judge is starting to get harsh with Brett even if he didn’t chew him out for his double violation of the Letter Order.  One can never predict the future, but I am cautiously optimistic that the judge will get rid of this the first chance he gets, without creating an issue for appeal.

As noted by one twitter wag noted that Bill “Baghdad Blob” Schmalfeldt had unprotected his twitter account at an inopportune time:

And I made a correction:

So that would be getting “kicked in the jimmies*” twice in one day.  Heh.

Anyway, I will post the entire thing momentarily, but really there is nothing more to it than what I just told you.

Stay tuned for any further developments.

Update: You can read the order, below the fold, for what it’s worth:

So ball’s in Brett’s court.  Will he get his reply in?  Was he smart enough to have drafted one already?  And does it comply with the judge’s case management order issued today?


* That means “in the beanbag,” right?  Right?


My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years.  I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video evidence.  If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on the right.  And thank you.

Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for snark and site updates.  And you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.  And you can read a little more about my novel, here.



I have accused some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct.  In some cases, the conduct is even criminal.  In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system.  I do not want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such violence.  This kind of conduct is not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.

In the particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him.  Do not call him.  Do not write him a letter.  Do not write him an email.  Do not text-message him.  Do not engage in any kind of directed communication.  I say this in part because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.

And for that matter, don’t go on his property.  Don’t sneak around and try to photograph him.  Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision.  Your behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).

And do not contact his organizations, either.  And most of all, leave his family alone.

The only exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might report.  And even then if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request.  That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.

And let me say something else.  In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above.  But if any of you have, stop it, and if you haven’t don’t start.

No comments:

Post a Comment