This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly
call The Kimberlin Saga®. If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not
everyone reads my blog. The short
version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over two years, his worst
conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime. I recognize that this might sound like an
incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in
other words, you don’t have to believe my word.
You only have to believe your eyes.
So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.
Admittedly
after Kimberlin’s
idiotic letter earlier this day, my own opposition to his attempt to amend
the complaint was filed yesterday. And
it’s on PACER, so there is no reason not to share it with you good folks.
As per usual
this is the same as what I filed except for marked redactions. And I am not sharing some extra
administrative crap I filed, such as copies of opinions not generally
available, the certificate of service and the proposed order.
Honestly, I
think it is self-explanatory, except to say that in all honesty, I think Mr. Smith’s motion
was better. Still, as you can see I said
other, different things, that might help build up that wall. What I said, I think, will help complement
what Smith and others have said.
Also you might
be reasonably confused as to what is going on with the corrected version. As you can see from my document when Brett moved
to amend he was supposed to provide a “clean” copy of the proposed amended
complaint and also a version that shows the changes. As you can see with mine, I have a full copy
of the version of the document showing the mark up. Mr. Smith does not. Why not?
Because Mr.
Smith gets all the documents by electronic service, which if I understand it,
means he gets it from PACER. And as you
might know, the PACER version apparently was incomplete, maybe due to a
scanning problem. By comparison, Brett
has to mail me mine. So he did mail me a
complete copy and I was able to use that.
Still Brett did
himself no favors reacting with such hostility (and illiteracy) to Mr. Smith’s
very polite email seeking to be made whole.
And this just after Brett lectured us on our supposed duty to be polite
to each other. (That rule requires
politeness in communications with him.
And I am, to the extent I say anything at all to him.)
Otherwise, I think
all of this speaks for itself, so I will let it. Hope you enjoy it.
Finally, since
I referenced Dr. King’s sermon, “Rediscovering Lost Values” here’s a chance to
listen to the whole thing:
I have to say
that in some ways I find this sermon to be underrated among his recorded
statements. Its idea that there are
absolutes in this universe, absolute right and absolute wrong, that there are
moral laws to this universe as surely as there is a law of gravity, has had a
profound effect on my thinking ever since I first heard it more than a decade
ago. It doesn’t mean that necessarily
justice is always done in this world. Stories
like that of Ann Franks tell you that justice is not always done on this
earth. But I equally believe that in the
next life people like Ms. Frank enjoy a special place in heaven, and her
killers are in a particularly hot part of the lake of fire. Justice is inevitable; it’s only a matter of
whether it is in this world or the next.
---------------------------------------
My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted
terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame
me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years. I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you
read starting here,
you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video
evidence. If you would like to help in
the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on
the right. And thank you.
Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing,
mostly for snark and site updates. And
you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel:
A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.
And you can read a little more about my
novel, here.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused
some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even
criminal. In all cases, the only justice
I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice
system. I do not want to see vigilante
violence against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the
particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part
because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want
that to happen to him.
And for that
matter, don’t go on his property. Don’t
sneak around and try to photograph him.
Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision. Your behavior could quickly cross the line
into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not
contact his organizations, either. And
most of all, leave his family alone.
The only
exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course
nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any
stories you might report. And even then
if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request. That this is a key element in making out a
harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you
refuse.
And let me say
something else. In my heart of hearts, I
don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
I'll be honest, I don't think it was that good. Sorry.
ReplyDeleteYou've got the right facts in there, but it's overly wordy on some points (specifically the multitude of errors) and woefully brief in others. You're lacking organization, both in specific sections and overall.
Basically, good facts, good law, needs better writing. I know you can do better, some of your previous motions were very good. Hope to see more of that in the future.
I understand that you were probably rushed putting this together.