The Brett Kimberlin Saga:

Follow this link to my BLOCKBUSTER STORY of how Brett Kimberlin, a convicted terrorist and perjurer, attempted to frame me for a crime, and then got me arrested for blogging when I exposed that misconduct to the world. That sounds like an incredible claim, but I provide primary documents and video evidence proving that he did this. And if you are moved by this story to provide a little help to myself and other victims of Mr. Kimberlin’s intimidation, such as Robert Stacy McCain, you can donate at the PayPal buttons on the right. And I thank everyone who has done so, and will do so.

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

My Opposition to Convicted (and Admitted) Forgerer Brett Kimberlin’s Motion for Leave to Amend

This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®.  If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not everyone reads my blog.  The short version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over two years, his worst conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime.   I recognize that this might sound like an incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in other words, you don’t have to believe my word.  You only have to believe your eyes.  So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.

Admittedly after Kimberlin’s idiotic letter earlier this day, my own opposition to his attempt to amend the complaint was filed yesterday.  And it’s on PACER, so there is no reason not to share it with you good folks.

As per usual this is the same as what I filed except for marked redactions.  And I am not sharing some extra administrative crap I filed, such as copies of opinions not generally available, the certificate of service and the proposed order.

Honestly, I think it is self-explanatory, except to say that in all honesty, I think Mr. Smith’s motion was better.  Still, as you can see I said other, different things, that might help build up that wall.  What I said, I think, will help complement what Smith and others have said.

Also you might be reasonably confused as to what is going on with the corrected version.  As you can see from my document when Brett moved to amend he was supposed to provide a “clean” copy of the proposed amended complaint and also a version that shows the changes.  As you can see with mine, I have a full copy of the version of the document showing the mark up.  Mr. Smith does not.  Why not?

Because Mr. Smith gets all the documents by electronic service, which if I understand it, means he gets it from PACER.  And as you might know, the PACER version apparently was incomplete, maybe due to a scanning problem.  By comparison, Brett has to mail me mine.  So he did mail me a complete copy and I was able to use that.

Still Brett did himself no favors reacting with such hostility (and illiteracy) to Mr. Smith’s very polite email seeking to be made whole.  And this just after Brett lectured us on our supposed duty to be polite to each other.  (That rule requires politeness in communications with him.  And I am, to the extent I say anything at all to him.)

Otherwise, I think all of this speaks for itself, so I will let it.  Hope you enjoy it.

Finally, since I referenced Dr. King’s sermon, “Rediscovering Lost Values” here’s a chance to listen to the whole thing:

I have to say that in some ways I find this sermon to be underrated among his recorded statements.  Its idea that there are absolutes in this universe, absolute right and absolute wrong, that there are moral laws to this universe as surely as there is a law of gravity, has had a profound effect on my thinking ever since I first heard it more than a decade ago.  It doesn’t mean that necessarily justice is always done in this world.  Stories like that of Ann Franks tell you that justice is not always done on this earth.  But I equally believe that in the next life people like Ms. Frank enjoy a special place in heaven, and her killers are in a particularly hot part of the lake of fire.  Justice is inevitable; it’s only a matter of whether it is in this world or the next.

My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten years.  I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these claims using documentary and video evidence.  If you would like to help in the fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on the right.  And thank you.

Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for snark and site updates.  And you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here.  And you can read a little more about my novel, here.



I have accused some people, particularly Brett Kimberlin, of reprehensible conduct.  In some cases, the conduct is even criminal.  In all cases, the only justice I want is through the appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system.  I do not want to see vigilante violence against any person or any threat of such violence.  This kind of conduct is not only morally wrong, but it is counter-productive.

In the particular case of Brett Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him.  Do not call him.  Do not write him a letter.  Do not write him an email.  Do not text-message him.  Do not engage in any kind of directed communication.  I say this in part because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want that to happen to him.

And for that matter, don’t go on his property.  Don’t sneak around and try to photograph him.  Frankly try not to even be within his field of vision.  Your behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to mention trespass and other concerns).

And do not contact his organizations, either.  And most of all, leave his family alone.

The only exception to all that is that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might report.  And even then if he tells you to stop contacting him, obey that request.  That this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that a person asks you to stop and you refuse.

And let me say something else.  In my heart of hearts, I don’t believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above.  But if any of you have, stop it, and if you haven’t don’t start.

1 comment:

  1. I'll be honest, I don't think it was that good. Sorry.

    You've got the right facts in there, but it's overly wordy on some points (specifically the multitude of errors) and woefully brief in others. You're lacking organization, both in specific sections and overall.

    Basically, good facts, good law, needs better writing. I know you can do better, some of your previous motions were very good. Hope to see more of that in the future.

    I understand that you were probably rushed putting this together.