This is the latest post in what I half-jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®. If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not
everyone reads my blog. The short
version is that Kimberlin has been harassing me for over a year, his worst
conduct being when he attempted to frame me for a crime. I recognize that this might sound like an
incredible claim, but I provide video and documentary evidence of that fact; in
other words, you don’t have to believe my word.
You only have to believe your eyes.
So, if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.
Update: Now I have posted all the documents I intend to post in the
short term, let me update all of these posts with where you can find each. This is a generic update, so some of these
links will be to this post. My basic
motion to dismiss is here,
but it’s barely worth reading—it literally just says that the case should be
dismissed for all the reasons stated in my memorandum of points of authorities. So that memorandum is the meat, and that is here. Next I have a motion to require verification,
here,
and finally I have a memorandum
aimed at convincing a judge to let whoever Kimberlin Unmasked is preserve his/her/their
anonymity. And finally we see DB
Capital Stategies’ motion to dismiss.
And that is it, for now.
And more popcorn is in
order. In fact, you may want to buy
stock in Orville Redenbacher, although this will be the last filing of the day
from me. I wanted to get all of this out
before Team Kimberlin put it out.
Now, first, in case there is any
confusion there are two cases Kimberlin has filed against me. The first, this dumb RICO suit is the subject
of the last three posts. That is the one
where he is suing a ridiculously long list of defendants, claiming that there
is an organized mafia out to get Kimberlin... including Simon and Shuster.
You know, sometimes all you have
to do is state a person’s argument to discredit it.
Meanwhile, you have this state
case which claims that there was an evil conspiracy of myself, Kimberlin
Unmasked (whoever he/she/they are), Robert McCain, John Hoge and Ali Akbar to
hypnotize Brett Kimberlin’s wife and force her to accuse him of having sex with
her underage, or something. It’s pretty
goofball and incoherent, but you can read the complaint here. In that case, I am being represented by
counsel but being a lawyer I can do a lot of stuff for him that is normal “second
chair work.”
Right now we have a couple
motions to dismiss on the docket, and we’ll see how that goes, but there is
also currently a fight over whether to force Google to cough up information potentially
identifying the person or persons known as Kimberlin Unmasked (which I am going
to call “KU” from now on).
Regular readers know I feel a
great deal of sympathy for KU. After
all, I went through exactly this process about two years ago, and while he didn’t
get my identity by court, eventually he learned of my real name through other
sources and he has been stalking and oppressing me ever since, and my wife. The last thing I would want to see is for someone
else to be subjected to all of that.
If I wasn’t in the case, I couldn’t
do a thing, except maybe give some legal advice. But since I am a part of the case, I am
allowed to share my opinion about every motion, pleading, etc. So we have “Defendant Walker’s Memorandum in
Support of Defendant Kimberlin Unmasked’s Motion to Quash.” As I said before, that title is kind of
misplaced. To recap, Kimberlin filed a
subpoena against Google in the state case aimed at unmasking whoever Kimberlin
Unmasked is. That subpoena was granted,
but I guess it didn’t get him what he wanted and so he sought more
information. So I thought he did what he
had to do and filed for a new subpoena, in part because someone told me it was
a subpoena. I was wrong. He just filed a motion to compel which is out
of order. In any case while
misunderstanding the posture of the situation—because I didn’t realize how
badly Kimberlin screwed up—the title of it is wrong. But I believe the law is spot on and, I hope,
helpful.
Another point to raise is if you
read the last two documents, much of this will be familiar. Some of the text and arguments are recycled
from the other two, because after all this was a new forum and there is no rule
against that. Indeed there is some
recycling between Kimberlin’s filings as well, which isn’t against any rules,
but could cause him trouble down the road.
But there is still plenty of fun to be had, here, and the purposes I am
putting some of these arguments to is different. In the motion to require verification, the
purpose of pointing out how
Brett Kimberlin tried to frame me for a crime was to show what a liar he
was. In this document I point that out
to show what I fear will happen to KU if Kimberlin gets his real name.
Finally, please note I am cutting
out two entire exhibits in order to avoid naming Brett Kimberlin’s eldest
daughter for reasons I articulated, here.
So without further ado, here’s
what I filed. Again, don’t get freaked
out by the length. Its twenty five pages
of original text, and then the rest is exhibits. And often the same exhibits as in the last
document. So doing the math that is 122
pages for this, 106 for the motion to require verification, 97 for the motion
to dismiss and accompanying memorandum.
So all told that is 325 pages. And
DVDs. And Brett will have to work over
the Christmas holiday to respond to them.
He really should have looked at a calendar before filing these cases.
Once again, we have video
exhibits. And again, they are all on YouTube. Indeed four of them are videos I have analyzed
on this blog before. Here’s embeds of each video:
Exhibit A:
Exhibit B:
Exhibit C:
Exhibit D:
And this is something I haven’t
talked much about before, because the elder daughter is in it. I am not even sure who she is in this. Other than his daughter, we see Brett is
working with many young women. I am sure
there is nothing wrong with that. But
this is the video that won his daughter an award for creativity from Lego. Good for her, even if I don’t agree with the
message.
Exhibit E:
And finally, you have seen this
just in the last post.
Exhibit F:
So, once again, why don’t I give
you the presentation I made that more dramatically compares what Brett
Kimberlin says happened with what actually did happen?
By the way, now there is
scuttlebutt that I am being represented by DB Capital Strategies in this
Federal RICO case. That simply isn’t
true. At the moment I am pro se, that is
representing myself, which is why I sign all of those documents personally. It appears that someone in the courthouse
just pressed the wrong button, and I have already written to DBCS’ attorney and
suggested she give them a call tomorrow to fix it.
Hey, speaking of DBCS*, I might
be able to post some stuff from them pretty soon. Let me see if I can swing it. The fun continues.
---------------------------------------
* DCBS stands for DB Capital
Strategies, not to be confused with CBBS, which is Cabin Boy Bill Schmalfeldt.
---------------------------------------
My wife and I have lost our jobs due to the
harassment of convicted terrorist Brett Kimberlin, including an attempt to get
us killed and to frame me for a crime carrying a sentence of up to ten
years. I know that claim sounds fantastic, but if you read starting here, you will see absolute proof of these claims
using documentary and video evidence. If you would like to help in the
fight to hold Mr. Kimberlin accountable, please hit the donation link on the
right. And thank you.
Follow me at Twitter @aaronworthing, mostly for snark and site updates. And
you can purchase my book (or borrow it for free if you have Amazon
Prime), Archangel: A Novel of Alternate, Recent History here. And you can read a little more about
my novel, here.
---------------------------------------
Disclaimer:
I have accused some people,
particularly Brett Kimberlin, of
reprehensible conduct. In some cases, the conduct is even
criminal. In all cases, the only justice I want is through the
appropriate legal process—such as the criminal justice system. I do not want to see vigilante violence
against any person or any threat of such violence. This kind of conduct is not only morally
wrong, but it is counter-productive.
In the particular case of Brett
Kimberlin, I do not want you to even contact him. Do not call him. Do not write him a letter. Do not write him an email. Do not text-message him. Do not engage in any kind of directed
communication. I say this in part
because under Maryland law, that can quickly become harassment and I don’t want
that to happen to him.
And for that matter, don’t go on
his property. Don’t sneak around and try
to photograph him. Frankly try not to
even be within his field of vision. Your
behavior could quickly cross the line into harassment in that way too (not to
mention trespass and other concerns).
And do not contact his
organizations, either. And most of all, leave his family alone.
The only exception to all that is
that if you are reporting on this, there is of course nothing wrong with
contacting him for things like his official response to any stories you might
report. And even then if he tells you to
stop contacting him, obey that request. That
this is a key element in making out a harassment claim under Maryland law—that
a person asks you to stop and you refuse.
And let me say something
else. In my heart of hearts, I don’t
believe that any person supporting me has done any of the above. But if any of you have, stop it, and if you
haven’t don’t start.
No comments:
Post a Comment