This is the latest post in what I call jokingly call The Kimberlin Saga®. If you are new to the story, that’s okay! Not everyone reads my blog. So if you are new to the story, go to this page and you’ll be able to catch up on what has been happening.
In Alex Pareene’s awful
piece on
The Kimberlin Saga®, there was one particular lie Kimberlin told that I didn’t rebut as fully as I could have. Here’s what Pareene said that Kimberlin said:
Kimberlin claims that Walker has now filed a suit against him in Virginia seeking a permanent injunction against Kimberlin that would bar him from ever mentioning Walker’s name, which would be a neat bit of irony.
So if Pareene is accurately representing Kimberlin’s words—and I call on him again to release the raw recordings—then this means that Kimberlin is lying, again.
I will give you five minutes to get over your shock. Here’s some music while you recover:
Joking aside, here’s what my Virginia Complaint actually asks for in relevant part:
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff request[s] an injunction against the Defendants enjoining them from 1) identifying the Plaintiff as the pseudonymous author known as Aaron Worthing or A.W., or posting personal information about the Plaintiff including but not limited to his home address, his current employer or his work address, 2) requiring the Defendants to remove all references from public view identifying the Plaintiff as the pseudonymous author known as Aaron Worthing or A.W., or providing personal information about the Plaintiff including but not limited to his home address, his current employer or his work address, 3) prohibiting the Defendants from contacting the Plaintiff or his immediate family or his current employer, 4) prohibiting the Defendants from approaching within 1,000 feet of the Plaintiff, his wife, his current employer and any future employer, 5) prohibiting the Defendants from conspiring with others to accomplish the above prohibited acts[.]
It also asks for damages up to two million dollars, too, which considering what all Kimberlin has put me through, and the malice involved, is low-balling it. Something tells me that twelve ordinary Virginians are not going to be very tolerant of this convicted domestic terrorist’s antics.
And bear in mind that on the very next page you see that this was filed on January 30, 2012, at a time when I was not yet thoroughly outted as Aaron Walker. As I said to Pareene, obviously much of that request for an injunction is moot now, though certain parts are still valid.
But it all highlighted to me again that I needed to get off my behind and share this document with you. I mean Kimberlin had lied to other reporters about this before and unlike Pareene, they didn’t publish Kimberlin’s falsehoods about my case without, you know, actually reading the complaint or otherwise seeking my rebuttal. You know, doing due diligence as we lawyer types say. But obviously Pareene has proven that you cannot depend on the diligence of reporters.
Otherwise, I am mostly going to let it speak for itself for a number of strategic reasons, below the fold. I will note that there is a lot of cutting and pasting going on here in my writing. Indeed I noticed that at one point two pages were almost exactly identical, except the paragraph numbers and the name of one state changed, which made me smile.
I will also note that under Virginia practice you don’t have to share all you know in a complaint. So don’t think for one moment that this is all I have to prove my case. This is all I have chosen to share in the complaint.
Anyway, without further ado, the Virginia Complaint, broken into two parts: